This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SpacemanSpiff (talk | contribs) at 06:08, 2 July 2009 (fix deletion statement with closer name, time stamp, format close box around title). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:08, 2 July 2009 by SpacemanSpiff (talk | contribs) (fix deletion statement with closer name, time stamp, format close box around title)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was delete per WP:SNOW by User:RegentsPark at 18:14, 1 July 2009
Mahesh dilemma
- Mahesh dilemma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article was PRODded once as OR, and contested by an IP with no explanation. Another PROD was added later, and I was seconding the PROD when I saw the earlier one, so bringing here instead. This is at best a term paper, but is entirely original research that is lacking in context, but based on the name of the contributor, this article is about his thoughts on a choice between life and intellect! There are a couple of Ghits, but nothing relevant. Delete SpacemanSpiff (talk) 01:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 01:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 01:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete I think Mahesh should take his dilemma somewhere else. Priyanath 01:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed, far, far away from here. Gtadoc (talk) 02:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- No dilemma as to the fate of this article: delete. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 02:11, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and per WP:MADEUP. The few Google hits I found are about different subjects. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 03:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOR and per common sense.--Talain (talk) 04:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOR. Salih (talk) 06:10, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete as original research and/or personal essay. JIP | Talk 06:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Need to be improved instead of deletion - The question will be asked anytime sooner than we think, and building a good article, consensus, knowledge on this subject is important for humans. Talk —Preceding undated comment added 10:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC).
- It's an interesting question but this is not the place to discuss it - see No Original Research. Misplaced Pages is not for building knowledge on a new subject - we only report what has been built elsewhere and can be verified from independent reliable sources.JohnCD (talk) 11:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOR. JohnCD (talk) 11:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOR. An early close would be justified for this obvious case. Abecedare (talk) 14:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete as soon as possible. Quite an example of WP:NOR. --Junius49 (talk) 01:57, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as per HOAX and MADEUP. Certainly this concept is not new as the life v/s intelligence debate has been on since the birth of Artificicial Intelligence in the 60s. Seems like a mashup of some documentaries I saw on Discovery. --Deepak D'Souza 06:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Looking pretty snowy. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:31, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Will a passing admin look at the snow here and take some action? -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 14:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.