This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Juliancolton (talk | contribs) at 00:33, 19 July 2009 (Relisting debate). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:33, 19 July 2009 by Juliancolton (talk | contribs) (Relisting debate)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Chloe Richards
- Chloe Richards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
might as well toss a few more on the barbie; non-notable fictional character with all the usual fancruft issues. delete. Jack Merridew 08:00, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 08:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 08:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 08:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep character spanned 10 years, there must be a fair bit of coverage out there in the Australian/UK press on this character.GunGagdin 11:25, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Minor character; no real-world significance. –Moondyne 03:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Ten years on a notable show is an obvious indication of notability. Edward321 (talk) 13:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Merge/Redirect Long spanning does not relate to notability - she was a minor character in the context of the series. Orderinchaos 13:01, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | 00:33, 19 July 2009 (UTC)