Misplaced Pages

User talk:Haizum

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by LifeStar (talk | contribs) at 16:03, 6 December 2005 (The other vandal was warned as well.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:03, 6 December 2005 by LifeStar (talk | contribs) (The other vandal was warned as well.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Please stop adding nonsense to Misplaced Pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Fire Star 15:17, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


All I did was delete the vandalism, then I left a note saying I did.

You should have checked the history before you accused me of screwing up the page.

Please restore my status or I will have no choice but to report it to higher-ups.

-H


You blanked the entire page out, that is not acceptable by wikipedia standards. You should have went through the history then and found a copy that was not vandalized and restore that version instead of simply blanking an entire page out. A lot of people have worked on that particular article and to just wipe it out is totally irresponsible and inconsiderate of those who put their time into it. I'm restoring the complaint logged against you by Fire Star & if you wish to take this up with the admins, go ahead. They've countlessly been blocking people who have done similiar things to that particular page as well. Next time do not blank a page, instead work to correct it if anything. --LifeStar 15:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


THE PAGE WAS ALREADY BLANKED OUT!

If I ever see the page blanked out again with crude language or pictures, I won't do anything lest I be blamed for something I clearly didn't do.

Like I said in my last comment, you could have looked at the history and found a copy that was not vandalized. It is TRUE that someone had vandalized right before you blanked the page, but the logical course would have been to go back to a GOOD copy of the article before the vandalism occurred. That's how we're able to restore the vandalized articles so fast. Next time, just try a little more before you decide to totally blank out the page b/c we see the last person who made the edit. Plus, blanking out a page is not advisable. --LifeStar 16:02, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
Also, the person who the first vandalism before you blanked the page was cited for vandalism too. --LifeStar 16:03, 6 December 2005 (UTC)