Misplaced Pages

Talk:Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories/FAQ

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dems on the move (talk | contribs) at 20:31, 23 July 2009 (missing period). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:31, 23 July 2009 by Dems on the move (talk | contribs) (missing period)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Below are answers to frequently asked questions about the corresponding page Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories. They address concerns, questions, and misconceptions which have repeatedly arisen on the talk page. Please update this material when needed.

To view the response to a question, click the link to the right of the question.

Please see Talk:Barack Obama for more frequently asked questions
Q1:Isn't the use of the terms "conspiracy theories" and "fringe" in the article title and body a violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on neutrality? A1: No. Reliable sources have treated and referred to the topic as a fringe conspiracy theory, rather than a legitimate controversy. The article reflects these sources as per Misplaced Pages's policy of verifiability. Consensus on the article title has been established through a RFC and has been repeatedly reaffirmed since. Q2:Can we discuss renaming the article or removing the "fringe" labeling? A2: Yes. Consensus can change, so new perspective on this issue is welcome, but please review the archives to see past discussions on this topic, and keep in mind Misplaced Pages policies and reliable sources when you frame your discussion. Note that unless new references in reliable sources claim that the theories are mainstream and no longer fringe, it is unlikely that a change in concensus would form. Category: