This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 12:45, 30 July 2009 (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Akhilleus/Archive 16.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:45, 30 July 2009 by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Akhilleus/Archive 16.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Q&A
Am I supposed to post my reply here or on my own Talk Page? Anyway, my reply is currently on my Talk Page. tcob44
Possible New sock
Gilbert Griffin yet another Sock of Muntuwandi The Count of Monte Cristo (talk) 05:08, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Kompolompo
Shouldn't he be blocked? Dougweller (talk) 05:27, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Allstarecho
Hi, would you have a review of the discussion at User_talk:Durova#Bluemarine_unblocked? About six weeks ago you lifted his indef for copyvio. During the discussions about his copyvios I was on the fence about whether to mention this discussion, where a few weeks beforehand he took an unusually hard line on copyright regarding another editor. Held back from mentioning that in the hope of bringing a reconciliation (or at least a measure of mutual respect and polite distance between those two editors). Now it's time to revisit the other editor's editing status and Allstarecho is making exactly the same oddly stringent demands, which are unlikely to be accepted by the community and would more probably reflect very poorly on Allstarecho if his own conduct comes up at ANI in future. It's a 'people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones' situation. Allstarecho mistakes me for a partisan in his content dispute, which makes it difficult to convey the message. It's going to be necessary to take a proposal to AN soon. Perhaps your good judgment and diplomacy would help here. If you think I'm out of line, please say so. If you agree with me, perhaps he'll listen to you. Durova 01:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Atlantis
The article Atlantis is undergoing a review as part of the good article sweeps project. You are listed as "actively involved with this article". The article does not seem to meet current requirements for a good article. It has been put on hold for a week; if these issues are addressed satisfactorily within that period the article will be kept as a GA, otherwise it will be delisted. Lampman (talk) 17:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)