This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Random user 39849958 (talk | contribs) at 02:25, 31 July 2009 (→Unneeded snarkiness). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:25, 31 July 2009 by Random user 39849958 (talk | contribs) (→Unneeded snarkiness)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- /Archive the first: November 2005 to June 2006. Welcome, questions, collabarations and controversy.
- /Archive the second
- /Archive the third
- /Archive the fourth
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Unneeded snarkiness
I don't appreciate your personal attacks here and here. I don't believe that these comments are helpful in anyway to our goal of good article writing. I am asking you to please refactor/remove your snarky comments per WP:TALK and specifically WP:NPA. Thank you. -- ǝʌlǝʍʇ ǝuo-ʎʇuǝʍʇ 19:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- You do not understand the basics of reliable sourcing and related rules/guidelines, and this is a perennial problem in your editing. Jefffire (talk) 19:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- I would disagree with you and ask you to assume good faith. I've been editing here just as long as you have so you can assume that I have just as good an understanding of WP:RS, WP:V, etc. as you do. So I ask nicely of you again, please remove/refactor your personal attacks on me. It's simple enough for you to do and after you've done so, if you would then like to talk about our mutual understanding of these basic yet core policies, I am happy to engage you in a civil conversation here or at my talk page. Perhaps I do have something to learn from you (and maybe vice-versa). Thanks again. -- ǝʌlǝʍʇ ǝuo-ʎʇuǝʍʇ 20:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- You need to learn that these far flung sources that no-one has ever heard of may be good enough for you- but they are simply not good enough by Misplaced Pages inclusion standards. I was please that you were apparently beginning to learn that, after all this time. Perhaps your days of offering UFOlogy journals as reliable medical sources are over? Jefffire (talk) 06:03, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- I asked you to be decent and remove your incivility and instead you have opted to continue with your snarky personal attacks. Duly noted. -- ǝʌlǝʍʇ ǝuo-ʎʇuǝʍʇ 02:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- You need to learn that these far flung sources that no-one has ever heard of may be good enough for you- but they are simply not good enough by Misplaced Pages inclusion standards. I was please that you were apparently beginning to learn that, after all this time. Perhaps your days of offering UFOlogy journals as reliable medical sources are over? Jefffire (talk) 06:03, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- I would disagree with you and ask you to assume good faith. I've been editing here just as long as you have so you can assume that I have just as good an understanding of WP:RS, WP:V, etc. as you do. So I ask nicely of you again, please remove/refactor your personal attacks on me. It's simple enough for you to do and after you've done so, if you would then like to talk about our mutual understanding of these basic yet core policies, I am happy to engage you in a civil conversation here or at my talk page. Perhaps I do have something to learn from you (and maybe vice-versa). Thanks again. -- ǝʌlǝʍʇ ǝuo-ʎʇuǝʍʇ 20:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)