This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NJA (talk | contribs) at 16:41, 1 August 2009 (→User-reported: note). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:41, 1 August 2009 by NJA (talk | contribs) (→User-reported: note)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)UAA navigation: Main page • Category • Instructions • Policy |
Noticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles and content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.
- Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks.
- Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person.
- Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional.
- For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information, please contact an oversighter and do not report it here.
- Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {{Uw-username}} or {{Uw-coi-username}} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
- Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously.
- Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports.
Bot-reported
- Redditart (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "4chan|8chan|reddit" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file these are typically names created as part of campaigns either from within or against one of these sites -- DQB (owner / report) 19:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Officialgovr (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:00, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 10:00, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- ConcordeGBOACandWelcomeBreak (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:10, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:10, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- DianeticsBridgeToKnowingness (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Promotional username for Scientology. Edits pushing Scientology point of view. Probable sock of User: Scientologist Perspective. Hairhorn (talk) 16:35, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Note: Likely sock, but not used to evade as I did tell them to create an account that wasn't against policy. I'm not familiar enough with the subject matter to know if it's promotional in view of policy. If their edits are in question you should discuss them and warn about conflict of interests. I think here using {{UsernameConcern}} and then taking to WP:RFCN or WP:COIN if they're unresponsive would be a good way to go.Nja 16:41, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- DJ LATIN PRINCE (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) — Promotional name, used in creating spam page. Calton | Talk 15:03, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Declined pending further discussion at WT:U. - Dank (push to talk) 15:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Djtakin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) — Promotional, used in creating spam page. Calton | Talk 15:03, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Declined pending further discussion at WT:U. - Dank (push to talk) 15:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)