This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kingoomieiii (talk | contribs) at 18:01, 6 August 2009 (Odd...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:01, 6 August 2009 by Kingoomieiii (talk | contribs) (Odd...)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 2 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Recent Changes
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
26 December 2024
- diffhist m Isabella Kruger 05:27 0 Ser Amantio di Nicolao talk contribs (add Category:21st-century South African sportswomen) Tag: AWB
- diffhist m Byeon Woo-seok filmography 05:27 +2 Paper9oll talk contribs (Formatting using script)
- diffhist Paumanok Path 05:27 +55 2607:fea8:3fb6:c900:1f70:114b:36:87 talk (→References) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Robert Burks 05:26 +4 Judith Monplaisir talk contribs (Link added) Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Newcomer task Newcomer task: copyedit
- diffhist m Irvette van Zyl 05:26 +69 Ser Amantio di Nicolao talk contribs (add Category:21st-century South African sportswomen) Tag: AWB
- diffhist Umayyad invasion of Gaul 05:26 +193 115.64.63.56 talk (→Loss of Septimania)
- diffhist m Irmgard Bensusan 05:26 +52 Ser Amantio di Nicolao talk contribs (→External links: add Category:21st-century South African sportswomen) Tag: AWB
- diffhist m Ine-Marí Venter 05:26 +52 Ser Amantio di Nicolao talk contribs (→External links: add Category:21st-century South African sportswomen) Tag: AWB
- diffhist m Kinbidhoo School 05:26 +20 Unilandofma talk contribs (→top: Added logo) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App section source
- diffhist m Ilze Hattingh 05:26 +52 Ser Amantio di Nicolao talk contribs (→External links: add Category:21st-century South African sportswomen) Tag: AWB
New Articles
26 December 2024
- 05:2205:22, 26 December 2024 Hannes Starkopf (hist | edit) Doremo (talk | contribs) (WP:TFOLWP: Content on this page is translated from the existing Estonian Misplaced Pages article at et:Hannes Starkopf; see its history for attribution.)
- 05:2205:22, 26 December 2024 Christmasland in New Taipei City (hist | edit) Heeheemalu (talk | contribs) (←Created page with '{{Short description|Christmas celebration in New Taipei}} {{Infobox recurring event | name = Christmasland in New Taipei City | native_name = 新北歡樂耶誕城 | logo = | logo_size = | logo_caption = | image = 2024_Christmasland_in_New_Taipei_City_(54181221382).jpg | image_size = | caption = | genre = Christmas event | date = mid Novembe...')
- 05:1905:19, 26 December 2024 Huìmìzì (hist | edit) Taiwania Justo (talk | contribs) (←Created page with ''''Huìmìzì''' ({{lang-zh|t=諱秘字|p=Huìmì zì|l=taboo-secret characters}}) is a type of text commonly found on Taoist talismans or ritual implements. ''Huì'' ({{lang|zh|諱}}) refers to "taboo names," which are the names of respected elders or revered figures.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.daoist.org/booksearch(test)/list012/64-8-66.pdf|title=道教神諱秘字探析|date=2024-12-24|accessdate=2024-12-24|work=弘道...') Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- 05:1205:12, 26 December 2024 Yunnan Provincial Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (hist | edit) Huangdan2060 (talk | contribs) (←Created page with '{{Infobox Central Committee outline | colorcode = {{party color|Chinese Communist Party}} | name = Yunnan Provincial Committee of the Chinese Communist Party | native_name = {{lang|zh-hans|中国共产党云南省委员会}} | image = Danghui.svg | body = Highest decision-making organ when Yunnan Provincial Congress is not in sess...')
- 05:0505:05, 26 December 2024 Shanxi Provincial Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (hist | edit) Huangdan2060 (talk | contribs) (←Created page with '{{Infobox Central Committee outline | colorcode = {{party color|Chinese Communist Party}} | name = Shanxi Provincial Committee of the Chinese Communist Party | native_name = {{lang|zh-hans|中国共产党山西省委员会}} | image = Danghui.svg | body = Highest decision-making organ when Shanxi Provincial Congress is not in sess...')
Star Trek
Thank you for your comments.
Please Note: I have spcecifically indicated in the text of the article, that THERE ARE TWO VIEPOINTS. Regardless of the fact that I can definitely see why THE CURRENT, SINGLE, DESCTIBED VIEWPOINT, IS NOT ONLY STUPID, BUT RATHER ALSO - ABUSIVE, WITH RESPECT TO ALL THOSE WHO HOLD THE OTHER (UNMENTIONED) VIEPOINT, I specifically took the trouble to mention BOTH, whereas NOBODY ELSE HAS BOTHERED.
I request that all involved shall calm down, out of their own volition, any emotional reflexes of tantrums, and of abuse towards other people's views, provoking war related to an ARTICLE ABOUT A MOVIE (!!!), NOT ABOUT SRVIVAL OF MANKIND.
Thank you.
--Shimon Yanowitz (talk) 16:12, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- There is one valid reason that your viewpoint isn't covered. There isn't a reliable source that supports it. The other one does, i included a link to it on the talk page. If you can't find a source as is approved by wp:rs then it is original research and thus not allowed. FYI, asking us to calm down when you SHOUT with caps doesn't help your arguement. Please review the policies before you proceed, it might help avoid blocks and such. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thaks for your disappointing reply. I do not reject the dubious, other viewpoint. Please note that (NOT CITING) AN EPISODE OF "THE NEXT GENERATION" television series, DOES NOT CONSTITUTE a "serious" "reference source" for the single viewpoint that is (mis) represented in the article, whereas, I constantly hear voices who are shouting "foul" about the sense that their (much more sensible, peaceful, non-emotional) interpretation is being abused, and their voices - stiflled by bullies. Please Note that the interpretation of millions of people who have seen this movie, does not qualify as "original research"! Any further stifling, or bullying, shall constitute a reason for a drastic measures. --Shimon Yanowitz (talk) 16:33, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- You really need to stop typing in capital letters (in what can only be perceived as a veiled attempt to instigate something more), and read Misplaced Pages's essays on original research carefully. It doesn't matter whether billions of people agree with you. Without proper documentation that this viewpoint exists in verifiable, reliable sources, it cannot be presented here on Wikpedia. Period. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
I would say you shot your arguement in the fooot with the verbage, "the interpretation of millions of people who have seen this movie" without a backup to say this is true then this is unreliable and original research.Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Please read carefully: Alternate Reality is defined as: "Parallel universe or alternative reality is a self-contained separate reality coexisting with, or replacing, one's own"
Now, there is nothing in that movie, which constitutes either "separeteness", nor "replacement", nor even "coexistence", since the entire unfolding of events is entirely contained in (i.e. consistent with) only ONE reality.
Now, since I don't know who you are, what you age is (I am 50, BTW), nor what your background is (Ph.D, here), I require that you please provide me with sufficient evidence verifying that you are capable of comprehension of the above, as well as your intellectual capability to understand why my approach is NOT "original research". Failure on you part to do so, shall be considered irrational, erratic behavior, on your part, of the type: "Go with it, bro", which you may find to have consequences contradictory to your own good. Thanks. --Shimon Yanowitz (talk) 17:21, 6 August 2009 (UTC)- More than a personal attack, I'm inclined to call this a threat. --King ♣ Talk 17:59, 6 August 2009 (UTC)