Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nightscream (talk | contribs) at 16:03, 28 August 2009 (→Red Hulk: ce). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Ultimate Hawkeye

Hey there, I saw what you put about my Ultimate Hawkeye detail, do you think I should set up his own page? If so, can you please help me do it? Havok 2 (talk) 14:27, 18 August 2009 (UTC) Havok2

There are no rules against providing advice. Lots42 (talk) 00:20, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Since I am not being understood; please feel free to report me if you think I am causing problems. Lots42 (talk) 00:28, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Marvel: Ultimate Alliance

Thanks for the contribs to Marvel: Ultimate Alliance, however it was already wikified in the correct format, as seen in the following featured articles: Half-Life 2, Halo: Combat Evolved, and Halo 3. Additionally, please take such large edits to the talk page for discussion before making them, as the article may be in a certain state for a reason. I respect your work on many Marvel-based articles, and appreciate the edits to this article, but again, please take large edits to the talk page first. Not trying to start a fight, just stating that the article already follows Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines as I've been working to improve the article to B-Class, then on to GA-Class. --Teancum (talk) 13:45, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Someone chopped off my section. Had to re-add it. --Teancum (talk) 22:14, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Listing superpowers

The list of a character's powers/abilities should be brief in the Superherobox, but when a character is super-strong and fast, for example Beast, editors have written "Superhuman strength, speed, stamina, agility, flexibility, reflexes, coordination, balance, endurance". That is just excessive. When a character has the ability to project and absorb energy, one should write Energy manipulation. But what about all these physical attributes? - DCincarnate (talk) 14:26, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, but doesn't superior physical attributes mean that the character is superior to everyone else? DCincarnate (talk) 15:07, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

JLA/Avengers

I was thinking of adding a small "Legacy" section to the bottom of the JLA/Avengers article, noting the elements from the series that played roles in the "Syndicate Rules" arc from JLA and the Trinity series. Since I noticed you've been active on that article in the past, I thought I'd run the idea by you. I'm thinking maybe a short paragraph (as opposed to a trivia-esque itemized list) stating the above, and perhaps noting as well that there have been (to my knowledge) no significant, in-universe Marvel references to the series since its publication.--Pennyforth (talk) 13:59, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Red Hulk

Hi. We've been over this before. It doesn't it makes sense to a reader to tell them "some issues" are this or that without tell them which ones or when. It's historically decontextualized to delete issue numbers or dates, and restrict them to refs, and the others agree with me. You tried to claim in February that your aesthetic bias against issues and dates was decided upon in this discussion. As you can see beginning on February 13 in thta discussion, no such thing was discussed nor decided upon, and when I brought it, the others agreed that such things do not have be removed, or restricted to refs, but merely mentioned with brevity and summarization in the right sections and parts of sentences. In addition, Hulk is no longer a split book, so it again makes no historical sense to say some of the issues "are" split books, as opposed to "were". There is also no reason to wikilink the word "red", nor remove author information from citations. But if you want to have a consensus discussion with me and the others, let me know. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 16:02, 28 August 2009 (UTC)