This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kaiserb (talk | contribs) at 16:40, 13 December 2005 (→Works well: Bot runner request). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:40, 13 December 2005 by Kaiserb (talk | contribs) (→Works well: Bot runner request)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)I'm interested
I would love to try out the new AutoWikiBrowser and provide feedback on it. Send an email to floresg2 AT gmail.com. Thank you. Gflores 22:20, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Me Too
I would like to try this out also it looks a lot friendlier than the pywiki framework --Kaiserb 00:23, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Downloadable
Anyone interested can download it here, bear in mind that it is a development version! Martin 09:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
- Is that an installer, or a self-contained executable? —Phil | Talk 12:52, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
- Self-contained executable. Gflores 16:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
weird edits?
You auto-thingy wasn't just doing a recat in this edit . You can see that it also added a space after the initial asterisk in lists (which is unnecessary), and also doing some other changes that I couldn't figure out what they were (removing spaces?). 22:54, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
- I removed some white space, and added some spaces to the bullet points to make the wiki text more readable at the same time as re-cating, whats weird about that? Martin 23:05, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
- Since I'd never seen your edits before yesterday, I decided to look at one today. Instead of the expected re-cat, the dif shows a whole bunch of changes plus the re-cat. That's why it looked weird to me. 23:35, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, among other improvements I am making more descriptive edit summaries easier ;) Also I think I won't bother with the very very minor edits from now on anyway. Martin 23:48, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
- Since I'd never seen your edits before yesterday, I decided to look at one today. Instead of the expected re-cat, the dif shows a whole bunch of changes plus the re-cat. That's why it looked weird to me. 23:35, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
Works well
The bot works quite well. The only issues I have had is when a blank page loads i.e. image with no tag. The bot carries the information from the previous edit and trys to fill in the blank page. — KaiserB 23:31, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks, I hadn't noticed that, I'll try and get it fixed soon. Martin 23:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
Can you please add me to the official users list for this bot software. Thank you, — KaiserB 16:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC)