This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Terrillja (talk | contribs) at 18:46, 14 September 2009 (Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Mac OS X . (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:46, 14 September 2009 by Terrillja (talk | contribs) (Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Mac OS X . (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Template:Archive box collapsible
Hangon templates
Please note that the {{hangon}} template should not be used on articles tagged for proposed deletion – only those that have been nominated for speedy deletion. The M.A.D. EP is not nominated for speedy deletion, and so should not have the hangon template. I made a brief note of this in my edit summary here. I will now remove the template from the page. Also, please do not type in capital letters – it's the equivalent to shouting. Cheers, Fribbulus Xax (talk) 17:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Re: RFCBot Jr.
Heh, it seems my edits were quickly overwritten, but I thought life should go on even if the bot was taking a break. When the light goes out, you dig out the candles... Reminds me what a good thing it is to have the bot around for performing the mechanical edits, though :P Jafeluv (talk) 19:43, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
September, 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Validbanks 34 (talk) 18:43, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
September 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mac OS X. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Both of you are being warned. Cut it out Terrillja talk 18:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)