Misplaced Pages

Talk:Revisionist historians

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by North Shoreman (talk | contribs) at 18:42, 22 September 2009 (→Revision of DAB page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:42, 22 September 2009 by North Shoreman (talk | contribs) (→Revision of DAB page)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
WikiProject iconHistory Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.


Holocaust denial

See discussion at Talk:Holocaust denial. --Ludvikus (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Revisionist historians vs. Historical revisionism

The two are not to be confused. --Ludvikus (talk) 13:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

List of notable revisionist historians

This include the following(--Ludvikus (talk) 15:03, 13 May 2008 (UTC)):

  1. *

Harry Elmer Barnes

He probably should be discussed in this article because of his "revisionist" view as to Germany's alleged "war guilt" - for starting WWI. --Ludvikus (talk) 04:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision of DAB page

There is no distinctly American version of historical revisionism -- instead, as the article Historical revisionism makes clear, revisionism is a legitimate process that covers historians in all countries. Also the DAB page needs to cover the subject Historical revisionism (negationism) which includes, but is not limited, to Holocaust denial. There is a long history on the discussion pages of the revisionism articles that shows how this division developed. The new stubb article does a very poor job, at present, in summarizing American historians and revisionism. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 18:42, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Categories: