Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rlevse

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JohnDBuell (talk | contribs) at 21:34, 16 December 2005 (→Vandals). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:34, 16 December 2005 by JohnDBuell (talk | contribs) (→Vandals)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

/RlevseTalkArchive1, 15 Nov 2005 -

TALK Section

Welcome!

Hello Rlevse, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --JiFish(/Contrib) 15:35, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

You might want to put this on your user page instead. --JiFish(/Contrib) 17:28, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Edit counting tool

Howdy. By using the tool found here, you can find out more about your edits than you ever cared to know, probably. Danthemankhan 20:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Changing lists into prose

Regarding the Examples of merit badge changes subsection of Merit badge types (BSA): It now just looks like an unbulleted list to me. Have you considered just rewriting all of it into one single paragraph? --JohnDBuell 17:20, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Vandals

If it was an image that suddenly appeared where one of your existing images SHOULD have been, then it was the image itself that was vandalized and not your page and its text itself. It sounds as if an administrator may have caught and restored the appropriate image. --JohnDBuell 21:19, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

I recently had a case where someone put in an inappropriate photograph with the same name of a photo that had been deleted because it was never properly sourced. And so any article that linked to the new image with the same name - surprise! - had an inappropriate photograph. That's why I was suspecting the images at first. --JohnDBuell 21:34, 16 December 2005 (UTC)