Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk | contribs) at 02:05, 13 October 2009 (→Question). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I remain active to answers queries related to CSBot, which I intent to keep operational as long as it is still useful and welcome.

Shalom from Hakham Hayim Malkhasy

Shalom, I read your notice that you found the similar info that I put into "Abraham Kefeli" in an other site. Thus, I am the member of the International Institute of the Crimean Karaites, and I have all Copy Rights given me by the director of the Institute Prof. Dr. Valentin Kefeli. Moreover, Abraham Kefeli is my friend.

Kol tuv Hayim— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hayim Malkhasy (talk • contribs)

Dahl's Foods

The article has been extensively rewritten. _{—Mattofwashington (talk) 05:05 13 August 2009 (UTC)}

Camilo Polavieja

I didn't copy it in a internal website, i copy it on a external website in http://en.wikipilipinas.org/index.php?title=Camilo_Polavieja but I only edit the Marques de Polavieja and (1837-1914)

Mexican Naval Aviation

Is it possible if i can paraphrase the article?Homan05

Anthrax War

I wrote an entry using the filmmakers' website -- with their permission since they are attending a film festival next month and showing this film -- info from their website was used on infowars.com -- the bot discovered the infowars website -- I've written a temporary article which is much shorter.Tjmayerinsf (talk)

Re: Roger Pederson

In regards to the copyright issue, it seems it was because of the official citation, which I've found in this context usually falls under the category of public domain. Packerfansam (talk) 18 August 2009

The New American Century

Same problem as happened with Anthrax Wars -- I am creating this for an upcoming screening in California, and am using *only* material from the filmmaker's official website at BuenaOndaFilms(dot)com -- the info has been copied on informationwars and other websites.Tjmayerinsf (talk)

correct names

I didn duplicate the name of "Tabriz municipality" and "Saat tower" also "Ark of Tabriz" and "Arg of Tabriz" "Saat tower" is just a part of the building of "Tabriz municipality" so "saat tower" is incorrect name also "Arg" is incorrect and the word "Ark" is correct, pls delet or redirect this two incorrect pages:"Saat tower" to "Tabriz municipality" and "Arg of Tabriz" to "Ark of Tabriz". I am an Tabrizian editor of wikipedia and I know the correct names, pls have a look to my userpage and my works about this page and my pix.

Regards,

Warning on "James Marion West"

Hi, I turned the James Marion West article into a disambig since the father and son are both famous (the original article was about the son. In the middle of my edits your bot complained that there were two articles that were the same and your message said I should offer an explanation here.

FYI: An overzealous editor whom I presumed received notification through the bot created a circular redirect and destroyed some of my changes while I was doing this. I undid his/her change and hopefully there won't be any more to that.

-- mcorazao

Re: CorenSearchBot for D. Daniel Vujic

The information as provided on the D. Daniel Vujic article is accurate and furthermore no copyright infringements have accrued, in particular the text excerpts borrowed from Plaxo as the information was provided by me. As for professional credits and additional biography confirmation there are dozens of reliable sources on the Internet to confirm the article, one such source is http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1729423/

D. Daniel Vujic

Beads of courage

Sorry about the copyright violation. I rewrote the article. Please remove the copyright violation error. Thanks. - BennyK95 - Talk 23:46, October 7 2009 (UTC)

False-positive from CorenSearchBot

See Talk:Cambridge University Catholic Chaplaincy. Thanks OrangeDog (talk • edits) 17:03, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Question on EE workshop page

Coren, I was wondering if you are able to provide a response to my question here? I realise the recent Law/undertow/Casliber situation must have absorbed an inordinate amount of ArbCom members' time, and in that light I suspect I am not the only one curious about the timeline for the EE case. I am also curious about whether the table summarising active cases on the main requests page, which indicates that a proposed decision is expected soon, still roughly reflects your expectations. Thanks, EdChem (talk) 14:52, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Indeed it has, but I've answered your question over there. — Coren  20:40, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Could you also please answer this question? Is the evidence deadline tomorrow? Offliner (talk) 20:48, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

CSB and flagged / patrolled revisions

Hi Coren,

There's a discussion underway at WT:RFA#WP:FPRR regarding selection of reviewers, and to cut to the chase, we were wondering whether it would be feasible to have CSB re-scan newly patrolled revisions for copyvio, which would remove part of the burden on part of the reviewers, speed up their work, but also ensure that we catch more of the vios introduced after article creation. The biggest plus of doing that, IMO, is that we will finally start getting the means to crack down on vios which may have remained in articles for years and wouldn't otherwise be caught unless the article gets peer reviewed or someone complains. What do you think? MLauba (talk) 21:41, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

That shouldn't be too hard, though I haven't looked into how to fetch the review log from the API. I'll look into it during the next week and comment on feasibility. — Coren  21:56, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Regarding Noor Specialist Hospital information

Hello Coren,

I got a copyright warning regarding posting information about the hospital, i have the right to do so and i work as a marketing and advertising officer at noor specialist hospital and you can contact me to confirm this at:

Hospital's email address :NSHbahrain@gmail.com

Or contact me: marketing@noorhospital.com

Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by NSHBAHRAIN (talk • contribs) 08:57, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Answered at user's talk page. MLauba (talk) 09:11, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Question

"other to fight editors perceived as being "opponents" and generally assuming bad faith from editors editing from a Russian or Western European point of view."

Could you clarify that. I actually don't know what you mean in that sentence. While I can guess you confused Russian point of view with that of pro-Putin supporters(of which not all Russians are, and remember that some list members were Russian)-I completely don't understand what you meant by Western European point of view ? Could clarify what it means and give examples ?--Molobo (talk) 20:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

It's obviously an oversimplification; simply a matter of "Us vs. Them". There is little point to going into detail about what the factions conceive each other to be, is there (if only because that's necessarily hyperbole, and would not be the same depending on who you asked)?

Sorry but while I think I can guess what you meant by Russian pov, I am unable to understand what you meant by Western point of view ? Clarification would be welcomed to understand your statement.--Molobo (talk) 22:11, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Oh, that! Well, it might not have been phrased felicitously, but what I meant is that in numerous cases there has been conflation of what sources are available vs. the "mainstream" (and therefore mostly Western on English Misplaced Pages) point of view. I suppose there could be a better way to phrase this, but I haven't managed to pin it down. — Coren  22:43, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

National Wildlife Refuges

It's still tagging me sometimes - everything I'm uploading is public domain. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:05, 13 October 2009 (UTC)