This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Samboy (talk | contribs) at 16:14, 14 October 2009 (I will delete this discussion momentarily). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:14, 14 October 2009 by Samboy (talk | contribs) (I will delete this discussion momentarily)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)GURPS Banestorm, and others
Thanks for your message, and for your edits on some GURPS articles, especially the notices about previous debates. There is no harm done in trying to restore "redirected" articles: it would be even better to add some sources! I live in Italy, so I have no easy access to (paper) game magazines which might feature reviews of these books... Happy editing, ] (]) 18:18, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Super work on Super Audio CD
|
The Cleanup Barnstar | |
| In recognition of your dedication in cleaning up Super Audio CD. Way to go! Binksternet (talk) 21:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC) |
Re: 209.150.50.65
Will do, thanks for the heads-up. –Juliancolton | 15:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Ladder theory
You are correct: the AFD on this article showed that people feel it's sufficiently notable for an article. That was three years ago, but I don't have any reason to believe consensus has changed since then. Thanks for pointing this out; if I'd noticed the AFD myself, I wouldn't have added the notability template to the article. Robofish (talk) 00:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:Fuerte-guadalupe-puebla.jpg
File:Fuerte-guadalupe-puebla.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Fuerte-guadalupe-puebla.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Misplaced Pages, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Misplaced Pages, in this case: ]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
MaraDNS
Glad to hear your project is gaining notability. That doesn't however change the fact that as the developer of MaraDNS you shouldn't be editing the article. Right now out of the 94 edits to the article, 34 of them have been made by yourself. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 12:48, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- What edits have I made this year (2009) to MaraDNS that violate the WP:COI policy? Please be aware that Misplaced Pages:COI#Non-controversial_edits points out I can be “Adding citations, especially when another editor has requested them” and “Deleting content that violates Misplaced Pages's biography of living persons policy.” Of this six edits I have done this year, one was to remove WP:BLP-violating material and the other five (edit 1 edit 2 edit 3 edit 4 edit 5) were to add citations and did not not change in any way the text of the article, and were done only after they were requested by another editor. I have discussed all of these edits on the talk page and no other editors have disagreed with my edits.
- I will add a wikipedian-bio template to the article’s talk page so other editors can be aware of these concerns. Samboy (talk) 14:49, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- just curious but how do you think that WP:BLP applies to this article? i don't see where the articles mentions your real name. Theserialcomma (talk) 20:30, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- It’s not exactly a secret I’m the primary developer of MaraDNS; the first hit when you Google my name mentions MaraDNS, not to mention the 5th hit and the 7th hit. Implying that I would just quit working on a project I’ve invested nearly a decade developing reflects poorly on me; it would imply I do not stick to my commitments. I have no problem having the MaraDNS page mentioning my current plans to no longer develop new features after I get MaraDNS 2.0 out the door; just don’t word it like I would leave security bugs unattended. Samboy (talk) 21:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- just curious but how do you think that WP:BLP applies to this article? i don't see where the articles mentions your real name. Theserialcomma (talk) 20:30, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Irony
Samboy, do you see the irony inherent in the combination of this edit and summary? Powers 15:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was starting a discussion in Talk:Redshirt (character) when something came up in real life and I didn’t get a chance to talk about it. Samboy (talk) 15:46, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- What I mean is that you were telling others not to edit war over something while at the same time continuing said edit war. That doesn't do much to de-escalate a situation. Powers 15:49, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- I’ve added a note to the talk page. Any reason you’re discussing this on my talk page instead of the article’s talk page? Samboy (talk) 16:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- As an aside, I will delete this discussion momentarily. I’m a little frustrated with how editors are going back and forth on the Redshirt article, there is little discussion on the take page, and how, as many times as we’ve asked for references, we’ve instead gotten justifications for going against Misplaced Pages policy and now we’re making personal accusations of bad-faith editing (observe I did not point to any particular editor in my summary, but here you are personally accusing me). Don’t make this too personal. Just find a reference backing up the Family Guy thing and everyone will be happy and go on their way. Samboy (talk) 16:14, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- I’ve added a note to the talk page. Any reason you’re discussing this on my talk page instead of the article’s talk page? Samboy (talk) 16:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- What I mean is that you were telling others not to edit war over something while at the same time continuing said edit war. That doesn't do much to de-escalate a situation. Powers 15:49, 14 October 2009 (UTC)