This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KTC (talk | contribs) at 03:45, 20 December 2005 (→Students' Union / Association sabs list deletion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:45, 20 December 2005 by KTC (talk | contribs) (→Students' Union / Association sabs list deletion)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This article is hardly balanced
- It's largely factual, is it not? --Coffeelover 22:06, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Factual is not the same as balanced. It depends whose facts you use
- What suggestions do you have? This is a very new article, based largely on UCL Unions entry. --Coffeelover 22:45, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Since next to nothing has been offered the article not being NPOV, can I propose to remove the tag until any time that someone actually puts forward a stronger case. If there are no objections, I'll do so in 24 hours. Timrollpickering 14:14, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
Students' Union / Association sabs list deletion
- I've started a discussion on
Chriscf's Talk Pageas this involve all the union's page. Please go there to provide your opinion if you're interested. -- KTC 16:04, 12 December 2005 (UTC)- I will be removing the above discussion from my talk page. User talk pages are for personal communication. They are not for conducting general content debates. Feel free to start a discussion in the Misplaced Pages namespace, but this is not an appropriate discussion for user pages. Chris talk back 16:01, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Discussion was needed because of your unilateral deletion on multiple pages. So in a sense, your talk page does fit for purpose. Anyhow, it's now at Talk:Students Union -- KTC 03:45, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
- I will be removing the above discussion from my talk page. User talk pages are for personal communication. They are not for conducting general content debates. Feel free to start a discussion in the Misplaced Pages namespace, but this is not an appropriate discussion for user pages. Chris talk back 16:01, 19 December 2005 (UTC)