This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tide rolls (talk | contribs) at 03:43, 20 October 2009 (Reverted edits by Willy wonka and the HUMAN factory to last revision by MiszaBot III (HG)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:43, 20 October 2009 by Tide rolls (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by Willy wonka and the HUMAN factory to last revision by MiszaBot III (HG))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Status: Online 
Definition of AA
I would be interested in your opinion on this discussion: Talk:Alcoholics Anonymous#Recovery vs. recovered
TUF 10 & TreyGeek Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Request for arbitration: Date delinking amendment motion
A request to amend the dates delinking arbitration case (filed 19 July 2009) has resulted in a motion (filed 2 August 2009) that proposes to change the restrictions imposed on you as a result of the case. The proposed amendment would affect the restrictions pertaining to 16 editors, all of whom are now being notified of the proposed amendment. Given that the proposed amendment affects your restrictions, and further that the proposed amendment will restrict the filing of further proposed amendments for a period of 30 days, your input is invited at the amendments page. You may view an unofficial table of the proposed changes here. Comments from affected parties are currently being considered by the Arbitration Committee. If you would like the arbitrators who have already voted to reconsider their votes in light of your comments, please indicate that in your comments.
For the Arbitration Committee
Seddσn | 03:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Arbitration motion regarding Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking
Per a motion at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment:
Having considered all the requests for amendment and requests for clarification submitted following the decision in Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking, the Arbitration Committee decides as follows:
- (1) All remedies in the decision providing that a specified user is topic-banned from editing or discussing "style and editing guidelines" (or similar wording) are modified by replacing these words with the words "style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates";
- (2) All remedies in the decision providing that a specified user is "prohibited from reversion of changes which are principally stylistic, except where all style elements are prescribed in the applicable style guideline" are modified by replacing these words with the words "prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates";
- (3) All editors whose restrictions are being narrowed are reminded to abide by all applicable policies and guidelines in their editing, so that further controversies such as the one that led to the arbitration case will not arise, and any disagreements concerning style guidelines can be addressed in a civil and efficient fashion;
- (4) Any party who believes the Date delinking decision should be further amended may file a new request for amendment. To allow time to evaluate the effect of the amendments already made, editors are asked to wait at least 30 days after this motion is passed before submitting any further amendment requests.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Tiptoety 04:06, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi
An editor that expressed concerns before now completely ignores the sources and wants to say which sources are valid and which isn't. This in no way helps with the wiki article. Please have a say here:Talk:Strikeforce Sea888 (talk) 23:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)