This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Franklin.vp (talk | contribs) at 03:20, 31 October 2009 (→On you reply to Bazoo and you achievements in FP nomination page.: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:20, 31 October 2009 by Franklin.vp (talk | contribs) (→On you reply to Bazoo and you achievements in FP nomination page.: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Nezzadar is currently:
Lost.
Check my status history for more info.
Update: On • Busy • Work/Class •
Off
Please Read Before Posting
On Old Conversations
Great news. I finally decided to archive. I don't have any intention of bringing back old postings and saving them, however postings from October 13th, 2009 and on can be found at my infinite archive subpage, aptly named "infinite archive subpage". It's called infinate because no matter how many things get posted, there will only ever be one subpage. Hope you have a wheel on that mouse. - Nezzadar
On New Conversations
Right, lets get this over with right off the bat folks. New topics go in new sections. New sections go at the bottom, level three headers, sign your posts, use common sense, and be civil. Seems simple enough, but I just have to elaborate. Mostly on the fourth one, that pesky little concept called common sense. Since some people don't possess it, I'll lay out what I am looking for.
1. Please only post constructive comments and questions.
2. Please do not post newsletters here.
3. If I nominated your article for deletion, please discuss the merits of my decision on the talk page or the deletion discussion page of the page I nominated for deletion, not here.
4. Do not flame or goad me. I have a bad track record for responding to that.
5. If I do not respond to you, it might be because I am asleep or busy. My Misplaced Pages hours are best described as "weird."
-Regards, Nezzadar.
The Board
FPC
Thanks for your comments, really appreciated. If only we had users like u since the beginning of this project. FWIW, all the users who voted in the nom are all newbies. Surprising, isn't it? --Muhammad(talk) 10:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- Are you being sarcastic or serious. Are you calling me a newbie or complementing me. I honestly cannot tell. Nezzadar 19:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- I think you'll find that he's being sarcastic. You did, after all, tell one of our most prolific, talented, level-headed, reasonable, and patient FP contributors to "grow up". I'm not here to comment on that, only giving you a hint as to the likely tone of Muhammad's comments. Maedin\ 19:29, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- Right. uw-npa2 it is. Please see "On New Conversations" #4. Nezzadar 21:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- I took the liberty of removing the template from Muhammad's talk page. I'm not just being difficult, but reminding you of some basic courtesies: "don't template the regulars" being the first and the other is a rather puerile sounding, "you started it". I have read Muhammad's comments again at the nomination and note that he didn't make any personal remarks, but that your remarks were. Time to let this one go,
Maedin\ 07:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- Whoever started it, it was wrong of me to lose my cool and I sincerely apologize. I hope you find this nomination to your satisfaction. Thanks Maedin :) --Muhammad(talk) 17:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes thanks Maedin, and sorry Muhammad. I am not known for levelheadedness, and at least 51% of this was my bad. Nezzadar 21:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- Whoever started it, it was wrong of me to lose my cool and I sincerely apologize. I hope you find this nomination to your satisfaction. Thanks Maedin :) --Muhammad(talk) 17:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- I took the liberty of removing the template from Muhammad's talk page. I'm not just being difficult, but reminding you of some basic courtesies: "don't template the regulars" being the first and the other is a rather puerile sounding, "you started it". I have read Muhammad's comments again at the nomination and note that he didn't make any personal remarks, but that your remarks were. Time to let this one go,
- Right. uw-npa2 it is. Please see "On New Conversations" #4. Nezzadar 21:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- I think you'll find that he's being sarcastic. You did, after all, tell one of our most prolific, talented, level-headed, reasonable, and patient FP contributors to "grow up". I'm not here to comment on that, only giving you a hint as to the likely tone of Muhammad's comments. Maedin\ 19:29, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
On you reply to Bazoo and you achievements in FP nomination page.
Well at least he is doing something productive. Even if the nomination is withdrawn or suspended. Editors can find here some references. Why you can't behave nicely. A good number of wikipedians are also academics themselves and even having to do research take some time to edit wikipedia. If you have to write a paper do so and come back afterward to illuminate wikipedia with what becomes known of your results. But even when you are busy you find some time to come and fill every single nomination with nothing (scroll dawn and you will see that the number is not small). If you have nothing to say listen, and listening you always learn something. You are trying too hard showing us all your ignorant side and if you keep doing it we are going to get convinced that is your true nature. Misplaced Pages is a place of learning. Look how many interesting things we have learned with this unsuccessful nomination: About a photographer, about a poet, about medicine, about costumes. Let us all wake up next day willing to listen and to learn from the other. It won't make us less. Franklin.vp 03:20, 31 October 2009 (UTC)