This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Starbois (talk | contribs) at 12:59, 10 November 2009 (→University of Reading Science & Technology Centre). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:59, 10 November 2009 by Starbois (talk | contribs) (→University of Reading Science & Technology Centre)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is a subpage of Jayjg's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Thanks for visiting my Talk: page.
If you are considering posting something to me, please: *Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
Comments which fail to follow the four rules above may be immediately archived or deleted. Thanks again for visiting. |
Archives |
no archives yet (create) |
This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
ANI notice
Hello, Jayjg. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have an interest in adding your comments. The thread is User:Ludvikus revisited. Thank you. --Ludvikus (talk) 14:20, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Human suit recreated as Human disguise
This is a notice to all who participated in the recent AfD of Human suit, here, that resulted in a consensus for delete. This article has been recreated as "Human disguise", and has been nominated for deletion: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Human disguise. Thank you. Verbal chat 21:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Soncino Talmud
Thanks for your note. I'll keep up the editing. -- Dauster (talk) 11:47, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Kadima
Hi Jayjg, An editor has been continuing an edit war on Kadima. I have contributed much to the lead and the body of the article and have tried to make it as clear and comprehensive as possible. I chose my words very carefully, noting that the party formed itself as of the center, etc. A New York Times article briefly but descriptively goes into detail to note the party's leftward shift. Many major news groups have been referring to Kadima as center-left, including the Washington Post, BBC, Reuters, and The Economist. So the last sentence in the lead reads: "...of the political center and center-left...", in addition to the various other descriptions it gives itself before. I have also noted that the party is (since its formation through now) is part of the left-wing bloc of parties in the Knesset. (See all sources in Talk:Kadima) Yet this user is being stubborn and disregarding this and all other sources for a mere article in The London Times that called Kadima "center-right." If you could help with the discussion article I'd appreciate it, or refer me to another admin who can. Thank you. --Shamir1 (talk) 18:58, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Editing scientific articles
Please take your reasoning regarding OR to the talk page, where you do not seem to have contributed. I am not totally convinced that you are correct. --Bduke (Discussion) 04:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
University of Reading Science & Technology Centre
At Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/University of Reading Science & Technology Centre you wrote:
The result was merge
I have no desire to dispute this consensus, but it isn't clear from the stated decision what article this article was to be merged with/into. At least two articles were suggested during the discussion (University of Reading and Whiteknights Park) but I can see no sign in the histories of either article that any such merge has taken place.
Could you help me understand how the decision has been executed. Thanks. -- Starbois (talk) 20:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Apologies; I hadn't seen your commit comment when you redirected the article. Please disregard. -- Starbois (talk) 12:58, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
?
If an author has been published on a certain website - in this case CODOH - and I wish to refer to the author's published words - then I fail to see how that website can be an unjustified source. Dr E P Lockstone (talk) 21:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC) Lockstone