User talk:Jcuk - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Moonriddengirl (talk | contribs) at 22:28, 16 November 2009 (→Copyright problem: Richard le Scrope: note). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:28, 16 November 2009 by Moonriddengirl (talk | contribs) (→Copyright problem: Richard le Scrope: note)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Hi! welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Misplaced Pages. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Misplaced Pages:How to edit a page.
To sign your posts (on talk pages, Articles for deletion page etc.) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
You can experiment in the test area.
You can get help at the Help Desk
Some other pages that will help you know more about Misplaced Pages: Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines, Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view, Misplaced Pages:Civility, Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not
If you made IP edits before creating a user account, you can attribute your IP edits to your account at Misplaced Pages:Changing attribution for an edit.

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Misplaced Pages. Drop a note at Misplaced Pages:New user log.

-- Utcursch | Talk to me

Hey

Hey. In general people tend to be given articles by their birth name and not an alias unless that is all they're known by. On Google I got as many hits for Brian "Dolphin" Taylor as Brian Taylor, and so thats where I moved it to.

An article needing wikified is one that isn't in the style of other Misplaced Pages articles. By reading some other articles you can probably see how to cleanup the article to Misplaced Pages standard, and can then remove the tag. Hedley 18:20, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

Image uploading

There are instructions at Misplaced Pages:Uploading_images, and the upload page is at Special:Upload -- reachable from the "Upload file" link in the "toolbox" in your left-hand sidebar (it might be at the top of the page if you have switched to a non-default skin).

Be certain about the copyright status of the image you are uploading. If you took it yourself, there's no problem -- in fact, if you took it yourself, you should consider uploading it to Wikimedia Commons instead. Doing so makes it available for all Wikimedia projects in all languages, and you can link to it from a WP article using the normal syntax. By uploading it (either locally or at Commons), you are agreeing to license the image under the GNU FDL, which means that anyone can copy and reuse it for any purpose, including commercial purposes, provided they credit you and don't try to claim copyright on the image themselves.

If you got the image from elsewhere, ask me more and I'll help you determine whether it's usable by Misplaced Pages, and if so what image copyright tag should be added. Thanks for asking! — Catherine\ 19:54, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

Playaway

Hi there. Playaway may be the title on the BBC website, but looking at the 1975 and 1984 titles on TV Ark () it's spelt 'Play Away'. So, I'm not sure what's going on with the BBC website.... Billy H 21:30, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Populations

It's not at all obvious. If you go to then you get an interface where you can download Lots of spreadsheets containing stats. Morwen - Talk 07:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Inclusionist

You may need to create an account on the Meta-Wikimedia site, where the AIW is. --King of All the Franks 01:16, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

I can sympathize. --King of All the Franks 10:07, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Disambiguations

Hi. I prefer to use Name, District if Name, County isn't good enough, not Name, Random Town, because you can figure out the right District to use from a map, at least. Morwen - Talk 12:02, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm referring to Scotton, Harrogate which you moved to Scotton, Knaresborough - the (informal) convention has been to use local government districts rather than the post town in the name. Keeps everything consistent - because the districts are subdivisions of the counties we use, whereas the post towns cross county boundaries. Morwen - Talk 12:21, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Google test

Could you be a little more careful in your application of the Google test on AFD in the future? I noticed you voted to keep an article because of 500+ Google hits, when it turned out it had less than a hundred non-duplicate hits.

Make sure the number isn't being overinflated by repeated mentions on a single site by clicking ahead to page 10 or so, and looking at the actual number instead of the initial estimate. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 23:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Verifiability

I've noticed that on many of your AfD votes, you state that "such and such exists and is verifiable," which is your reason for keeping. I can respect that, but are you aware of the standard of verifiability? Please read WP:V (policy) and WP:RS (guideline) for what the standards of verifiability are. Just because something exists and is verifiable by word of mouth or personal knowledge does not mean it meets the standards that Misplaced Pages requires. Regards, howch e ng {chat} 16:59, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Unfortunately, Google hits in and of themselves do not constitute verification. If all the hits are personal blogs or free web sites or whatever, that doesn't count. WP:RS defines what "reliable sources" are, although that's only a guideline because for more obscure yet encyclopedic topics you won't be able to find mainstream sources. For example, my own web site is Google-able, but it has received no press or industry or any other coverage in any reputable publication, and therefore by Misplaced Pages standards is unverifiable. I realize you've only started to become involved in AfD discussions very recently, so you may have not seen some of the sockpuppet-fests we get regularly, but what we try to explain to newbies (and I'm not trying to say that you're a sockpuppet or use sockpuppets or anything like that, but you are an AfD newbie) is that Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia and therefore by definition is a tertiary source. It does not make news (a la primary sources), it does not report news (a la secondary sources), but instead reports on what others have deemed to be newsworthy -- this is spelled more in WP:NOT: Misplaced Pages is not an indiscriminate collection of information. It may not be a paper encyclopedia and thus not subject to size limitations, but that doesn't mean we have articles on everything under the sun just because they exist. We must discriminate (in the sense of "discriminating tastes," not "racial discrimination") to determine what stays and what goes. Now the line that gets drawn is subject to debate and thus you have inclusionists and deletionists, but the thing that nobody argues about is verification because it's policy and it's adequately spelled out. I encourage you to read through these policies carefully, and maybe even lurk a bit more in AfD. You'll find that some people are out to delete almost everything, but you'll also find that the majority of participants apply the standards which have been accepted by general consensus. In doing so, you should get an idea of what the consensus is and if you so choose, push it more towards the inclusionist stance, but please don't go throwing around the word "verifiable" when you're not using it as it is understood on Misplaced Pages. Best regards, howch e ng {chat} 17:33, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!!

Attempt to remove all Jewish lists

Hi. An attempt is being made to force the deletion of all Jewish lists from Misplaced Pages. Please see the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Centralized_discussion/Lists_by_religion-ethnicity_and_profession#Proposed_amendment:_remove_most_Jewish-related_lists and my compromise proposals at Wikipedia_talk:Centralized_discussion/Lists_by_religion-ethnicity_and_profession#Proposal_to_make_Jewish_lists_and_categories_historical_only. Thanks Arniep 10:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Sharon Tendler/Cindy the Dolphin

Hi, I noticed that you took part in the previous AFD on Cindy the Dolphin. Well the article is now up for deletion again. I thought you might like to vote. Afd Cindy the Dolphin. Thanks Englishrose 23:07, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Cleanup Tag

Cripes, when I look back at it, probably not so much the cleanup, its the catneeded issue when I am going for my random page mania :) I suppose, (a) as long as most of the links are ok, it has a category, there was no real need for it afterall. Apologies! Please remove it! SatuSuro 00:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC) aka vcxlor

Tupton

Please don't remove the Articles for Deletion notice from the top of articles when they are still under consideration by the community. This is considered vandalism. Many thanks. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 23:14, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

AfD Carry On Please

Are you aware of any reason why the above AfD (which I think you bought forward?) would be locked? Have just been trying to vote on it and cant get it... Cheers Jcuk 18:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi, yes I nominated it. I just checked and it doesn't appear to be locked, very strange. --Muchness 18:45, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Come and vote your mind

Dear Christian friend,

I saw you on the list of Christian Wikipedians and wanted to let you know about something. The other day, someone nominated 12 Christian biography entries for deletion! They include a Christian university list of people (not unlike 68 other lists like it), presidents of universities, and authors of many books.

Since that time, people have been voting. Please take this message as a call to vote; not a call to vote a certain way. I respect you and your ability to come, read the entry, and make a wise decision. In other words, I’m not vote stacking or campaigning; simply letting you know something that you’d probably like to know.

By the way, my friend recently started an organization called Wiki4Christ. If you’d like to join a network of Christians with a purpose on Misplaced Pages, please see the site!

Below are some of the links that need attention. Thanks for your consideration.

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Louisiana_Baptist_University_people_%28second_nomination%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Neal_Weaver

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jimmy_DeYoung

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_Combs

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Robert_Morey

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Daniel_Dorim_Kim

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/J._Otis_Ledbetter

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ron_Moseley

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mike_Randall

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Charles_Pack

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mal_Couch

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thomas_Ice

God bless you, Wiggins2 07:07, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Rebecca J. Nelson

I've unearthed a bit more information about this person, you may want to change your vote on Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Rebecca_J._Nelson. Thanks. Crypticfirefly 05:41, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Deletion vote

Greetings, Jcuk!
In the VFD on Arthur Stanley Katz you supported my position to preserve the article, which was on a candidate for Congress in Ohio. Several of the candidates whose articles were deleted I put on a special "minor candidates" page, which is now up for deletion as well. I wonder if you would offer your comments there. It is at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ohio second congressional district other candidates. PedanticallySpeaking 17:10, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikilinking dates

Hi. Please don't wikilink months (e.g., September) unless the month is significant beyond being a date. Years should not be wikilinked excessively either. Dates, however, should be wikilinked to allow for the date to be displayed as defined in the user's preferences. See Misplaced Pages:Dates#Date formatting. Thanks. --Whouk (talk) 14:46, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ibat

Hi, I've updated this AfD with some info, and am notifying everyone who has participated in the discussion so far. I'm doing this because I think some users have misunderstood what Ibat is. Please read my comments at the AfD, and if you wish, update your comments. Thanks! Mindmatrix 00:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

AfD

Hi Jcuk, Did you make these edits to the AfD for Shortwave transmitter Jülich? Someone with IP 80.177.152.156 signed your name. Just curious. --F a ng Aili 16:36, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Sexual Victimization of Native American Women

You voted to keep this article. It is still a very bad article. Since you obviously thought that it has merit, maybe you would be interested in bringing it in line with Misplaced Pages policy. If you are unwilling or unable to fix this article, maybe you should consider not voting to keep articles like this in future AfD votes. BrianGCrawfordMA 20:23, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Regarding Robert Angleton

Regarding Robert Angleton, I got it all from the book "Death in Texas" by Carlton Smith. WhisperToMe 03:24, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Jclary.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jclary.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Misplaced Pages because of copyright law (see Misplaced Pages's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Misplaced Pages are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Misplaced Pages talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 06:50, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Bresslaw.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bresslaw.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:21, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Hobcarts.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hobcarts.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Misplaced Pages (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam 15:15, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

SLF

Hi. I can't remember exactly what I had in mind when I added the tag. Looking at it now though, I think it need an expansion of the introduction for definate (this can be a brief summary of the other subsections of the article, if I understand the Manual of Style correctly), an infobox as with other artists/groups, and a new subsection on what they're currently doing (both individually and as a group). I think the sections need re-ordering and maybe sub'ed themselves - the descriptions of the albums put under a subsection maybe. These are just suggestions of course! I'd have a look at some of the good articles like The Beatles maybe and try to keep roughly consistant with it. Hope my suggestions are of help anyway, and have fun editing it. :) --Mal 01:45, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Gay rights in Chad

If, as you say on your user page, you honestly believe that 99.999999999% of articles are worth keeping and/or expanding or at the VERY worst merging, then how could you vote for downright deletion of the article Gay rights in Chad? We're not quite yet at 66666666667 articles in Misplaced Pages. Just curious. Lambiam 01:15, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

I must respectfully disagree that your explanation was very clear, but that was not my point. Apparently you felt that there was at least one article not worth keeping. I was not enquiring after your reasons, but merely pointing out a contradiction or inconsistency between your vote and your stated honest belief. Lambiam 01:33, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Katelyn Faber

Could you weigh in at the bottom of the Talk Page for Katelyn Faber regarding the inclusion of an image of her? User:Tufflaw, who unsuccessfully tried to have the entire article deleted back in December 2005 insists on censoring/deleting it for extremely specious reasons, and I've been asked to gather a consensus. Please read the bottom two sections of that page. Thanks. Nightscream 19:02, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Hello, I saw your question. The image is in the last version of the article. --FloNight 21:35, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Slfdolph.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Slfdolph.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Misplaced Pages (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam 23:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Wikiethics

Hi,

We started a proposal Misplaced Pages:Wikiethics to state the existing policies coherently and make suggestions on improving the editorial standards in Wiki. I thought you might be interested in contributing to that proposal.

Unfortunately, a pro-porn and pro-offense lobby is trying to make this proposal a failure. They unilaterally started an approval poll although almost no one including me believe that it is time for a vote, simply because the policy is not ready. It is not even written completely.

Editors who thinks that the policy needs to be improved rather than killed by an unfair poll at the beginning of the proposal, started another poll ('Do we really need a poll at this stage?') at the same time. The poll is vandalized for a while but it is stable now. A NO vote on this ('Do we really need a poll now?') poll will strengthen the position of the editors who are willing to improve the ethics policy further.

If you have concerns about the ethics and editorial standards in Wiki, please visit the page Misplaced Pages:Wikiethics with your suggestions on the policy. We have two subpages: Arguments and Sections. You might want to consider reviewing these pages as well...

Thanks in advance. Resid Gulerdem 01:02, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Faculdade de Engenharia Elétrica e da Computação da Universidade Estadual de Campinas

Regarding your comment there, It is part of Misplaced Pages policy that articles that are copied and pasted from another Misplaced Pages without translation can be speedily deleted in order to discourage the practice. I don't remember where I saw that policy, but I know it's there... I think that's what they were talking about. Grand master ka 07:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Notability of Judges

I posted this here as well as on the AfD page just for the benefit of all who are wondering the same thing.

I don't think there is a set policy on judges. State judges can be notable and Federal judges can be obscure. But your state district court judge is going to be more likely to have your run-of-the-mill cases like car theft, assault and the occasional murder. Sometimes state judges like Lance Ito become quite notable because of a notable trial, OJ Simpson for instance. A Federal judge requires you to get a Presidential appointment, which can end up becoming political, and you also get a shot at constitutional issues. If someone could point out a case with major implications that Judge Rice presided over, that would change my opinion. So as in everything here at Misplaced Pages, it's very subjective, for me I like a rule of thumb. Montco 02:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Lists

Jcuk, I have never and will never suggest that something should be deleted because it is a list. However, WP articles should not be bare lists of links - you proved my point when you cited List of Premier League stadiums, a great list, look at all the context that provides! The nominated list of Australian basketball venues contravenes WP:NOT which is an official policy. A list like this should either be included in a wider article about basketball in Aus, or fleshed out like the LoPLs, something a slew of keep voters, including several who appear to be familiar with the topic have been unable or unwilling to do, or even make their keep votes conditional upon. Inclusionism is peachy, but it is still superceded by official policy. Nice1, Deizio 14:00, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Good work that man, nom happily withdrawn. Deizio 21:50, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

List of hardcore punk bands cleanup

I've been cleaning up some lists. I checked every article linked from List of hardcore punk bands, and made sure they were in Category:Hardcore punk groups. (About 60% were; the rest have been fixed.) Then I deleted the list info in List of hardcore punk bands. What do you think?

I'm trying to figure out how to automate more of Misplaced Pages, and this is a start. --John Nagle 19:28, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Statutory Instruments

Hi. I notice that you have previously voted or commented on the proposal to delete the List of Statutory Instruments of the United Kingdom, 1996 page. The debate about the delete proposal ended with no consensus. This is just to let you know that I have started a discussion on how to go forward from here. I am currently trying to define what the problems with the page are so that we can try to find a fix for them that stops short of outright deletion. If you wish to take part in the discussion, the new debate can be found here. Thank you. Road Wizard 00:01, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Deleting Camp Avoda again

Hi, because of your past interest in this, you may want to see the new vote at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Camp Avoda (2nd nomination), best wishes, IZAK 14:24, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion

Hello! I noticed that you have been a contributor to articles on Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. You may be interested in checking out a new WikiProject - WikiProject Anglicanism. Please consider signing up and participating in this collaborative effort to improve and expand Anglican-related articles! Cheers! Fishhead64 23:29, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Unblock

I strongly suspect I'll be talking to myself, but what the hell here goes! I wish to protest strongly at being A>Blocked and B> not being given the slightest sniff of a warning!! I have done NOTHING against wiki policy, and request my block is lifted as soon as is humanely possible.

Unspecified source for Image:RAFMastAircrew.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RAFMastAircrew.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Misplaced Pages (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —The preceding signed comment was added by Angr (talk • contribs). 08:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RAFwo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RAFwo.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Misplaced Pages (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

List of beat 'em ups undeletion request

I have nominated List of beat 'em ups to be undeleted, under the reasoning that it is not redundant to the category; it contains many games which are not covered by the category, and may never be able to be covered by it. In addition, the list can do more than the category. It can put date, developer, release date, system, et al., useful especially for articles that would be difficult to create an article for. I hope that you will vote on this and hopefully support its undeletion, on the basis that it does something that makes it not redundant to the category. - A Link to the Past (talk) 22:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Slfcurrentofficial.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Slfcurrentofficial.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 15:59, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Slfnow.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Slfnow.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

Image dispute

Please calm down. If you have a convincing argument why that image cannot be replaced, then it won't be deleted. Leaving angry, breathless messages on my talk page won't really have an effect on the decision one way or the other, no matter how many exclamation points you use. —Chowbok ☠ 18:39, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Simply saying they gave "permission" is too vague. What permission did they give you, specifically? Can anybody reproduce and edit the photo for any reason, even for profit? If not, then it's not good enough. —Chowbok ☠ 18:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Countess Charlotte of Rosenborg

I moved the article primarily because it didn't have the comma in there in the first place (Charlotte Countess of Rosenborg, instead of Charlotte, Countess of Rosenborg) and also I think some people might think it's some sort of royal courtesey, like Letizia, Princess of Asturias or Mathilde, Duchess of Brabant. Morhange 21:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Greetings Jcuk.

One of the articles you've created contained a misspelled name. "Ulrik" is a Danish name which can only be spelled in one way, so I've taken the liberty of moving the relevant article to Count Ulrik of Rosenborg. Hope you don't mind. Happy editing. Valentinian 21:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi again.

I don't know much about the subject but da:Greve af Rosenborg had more information. Whenever a Danish royal married a commoner (or without the consent of the monarch) he / she lost all claims to the throne. This practice was last continued during the reign of King Christian X. A total of seven royals left the royal family this way and six of them had issue. I'll translate the relevant part of the page:

Sons of Prince Valdemar:
- Prince Aage. Son of Prince Valdemar (who was a son of Christian IX). Married Mathilde di Bergolo (1914). Issue. Male line extinct 1995.
- Prince Erik. Son of Prince Valdemar (see above). Married Lois Frances Booth (1924). Issue.
- Prince Viggo. Son of Prince Valdemar. Married Eleanor Margaret Green (1924). No issue.

Prince Flemming. Son of Prince Axel who was a son of Prince Valdemar. Married Ruth Nielsen (1949). Issue.
Prince Oluf. Son of Prince Harald who has a son of Frederick VIII. Married Dorrit Puggaard-Müller (1948). Issue.
Sons of Prince Knud
- Prince Ingolf. Son of Prince Knud (Frederick IX's younger brother). Marrid Inge Terney (1968). Issue. Second marriage: Countess Sussie of Rosenborg (I don't know her maiden name). He is first cousin to the Queen.
- Prince Christian. Son of Prince Knud (mentioned before). Married Anne Dorte Maltoft-Nielsen (1971). Issue. First cousin to the Queen.

Note that Prince Knud also fathered a daughter, Princess Elisabeth. Since she never married, she retains her place in the line of succession.

Hope this helps a bit. It is possible that several of these persons might already have articles. Perhaps if you pick one of the Danish monarchs and follow the list of issue in the infobox? Regards. Valentinian 23:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Rosenborgs

All of these articles mention the current place in the line of British succession of their subject. And they will all need to be changed by the end of the month. Cia-Rosemarie Roderburg, Count Alexander-Wilhelm Bernadotte and Prince Pieter-Christiaan of Orange-Nassau are all expecting children in November. Bettina Haug is expecting in December. Add that to the spring births of the Prince of Asturias, Prince of Orange and Crown Prince of Denmark, and there will have to be constant updating on those articles. Morhange 14:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Chowbok RfC

I have begun RfC procedures for User:Chowbok. Since you've had previous disputes with him about image uploads, maybe you'd like to add your commentary? TheQuandry 03:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Bobby Barr

Hi, I note your comment "Very odd nomination, to say the least!" Did I miss a wiki policy that all professional footballers are notable per se? If so I should withdraw the afd nomination. Regards, Springnuts 12:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Aidan J. David

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Aidan J. David, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Oo7565 20:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:RoyCastle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RoyCastle.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 13:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Slfdolph.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Slfdolph.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Early.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Early.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

List of Australian dancers

Hey there. There are indeed lists that are redundant to categories. But if the list article became a table showing prominant dance style, awards, date of birth, place where the dancer trained (major schools or something) then the list wouldn't be redundant to the category and it wouldn't be up for deletion.

I'm not voting though.Ga rr ie 01:00, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

PC

- Kittybrewster 22:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

PGNx Media

An editor has asked for a deletion review of PGNx Media (see article here ). Since you participated in the discussion, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Arielguzman 01:22, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Basil Acres

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Basil Acres, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Postcard Cathy 01:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Windham Wyndham-Quin, 5th Earl of Dunraven and Mount-Earl

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Windham Wyndham-Quin, 5th Earl of Dunraven and Mount-Earl, by Princess Tiswas, another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Windham Wyndham-Quin, 5th Earl of Dunraven and Mount-Earl seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Windham Wyndham-Quin, 5th Earl of Dunraven and Mount-Earl, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Windham Wyndham-Quin, 5th Earl of Dunraven and Mount-Earl itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Basil Acres

Just because you are a professional athlete doesn't mean you are a notable one. He may have spent his whole career on the bench or he may very well have had a stellar career, or even an ordinary one. The point is, as I mentioned, the article didn't tell us and that is Writing 101- write to the sports idiots like me and not the sports fans like you so I learn at least a little bit to know that Mr. Acres is/was notable. Postcard Cathy 02:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

List_of_songs_about_masturbation is in it's 5th AfD

List_of_songs_about_masturbation is up for it's fifth AfD. You participated in an earlier one. If you wish to participate again, please go to Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_songs_about_masturbation_(5th_nomination) -- Lentower 03:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Jakenow.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Jakenow.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 21:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Australian_Army_Corporal_Insignia.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Australian_Army_Corporal_Insignia.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:47, 4 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 03:47, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Canadacorp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Canadacorp.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 17:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Canadasergeant.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Canadasergeant.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 17:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_03.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_03.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:12, 4 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 18:12, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_04.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_04.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:12, 4 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 18:12, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_05.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_05.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:53, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 01:53, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_06.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_06.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 01:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_07.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_07.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 01:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_08.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_08.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 01:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_09.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_09.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 01:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_10.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_10.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 01:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_11.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_11.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 01:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_12.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_12.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 01:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_13.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_13.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 01:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_14.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_14.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 02:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_15.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_15.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 02:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_16.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_16.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 02:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_17.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_17.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 02:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_18.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_18.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 02:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_19.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_19.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 02:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_20.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_20.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 02:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_21.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_21.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 02:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_22.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_22.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:03, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 02:03, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_25.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995_25.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:03, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 02:03, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995-private-first-class.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995-private-first-class.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:03, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 02:03, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995-private.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Czech-airforce-since-1995-private.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:04, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 02:04, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RAF_ChiefTech.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RAF_ChiefTech.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 18:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RAFFltSgt.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RAFFltSgt.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 18:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RAFJrTech.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RAFJrTech.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 18:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RAFLAC.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RAFLAC.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 18:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RAFMastAircrew.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RAFMastAircrew.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 18:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RAFSAC.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RAFSAC.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 18:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RAFwo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RAFwo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 18:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Rafcorp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rafcorp.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 15:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of fictitious films (2nd nomination)

As you participated in the first AfD for this article, I thought you would be interested that it has been nominated once again. SkierRMH 21:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Brian Sinclair

An article that you have been involved in editing, Brian Sinclair, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Brian Sinclair. Thank you. -- Daytona2 16:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Williams Wollaston

Hallo, I've just found that Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (people) says "Years of birth and death should not be used in a page title to distinguish between people of the same name." How about renaming your two Williams Wollaston as "William Wollaston (Ipswich MP, elected 1768)" and "... 1733)"? A dab page would be useful too... I found when trying to sort out William Thompson yesterday that he was (Suffolk) in one place and (Ipswich MP) somewhere else, but dab pages can help establish a standard name for each chap. Good luck with it all! (How did I get involved in Ipswich MPs? I was chasing up to see whether Richard Richardson, owner of a renowned garden at Bierley Hall near Bradford, was in WP, and got led on from there.) PamD (talk) 21:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Samuel Kent

Found him on a "what links here" to the WW page: dates in succession box look wrong, and I leave it to you to dab the WW links! Cheers, PamD (talk) 08:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Thomases Cobbold

Can we have your views at Talk:Thomas Cobbold? PamD (talk) 16:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:50millElv.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:50millElv.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Guideuniform2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Guideuniform2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SLFATB.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SLFATB.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SLFGFI.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SLFGFI.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SLFNobodys.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SLFNobodys.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

Doug Bennett (record producer)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Doug Bennett (record producer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Doug Bennett (record producer). BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Cargill.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cargill.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly 04:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bresslaw.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bresslaw.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - May 2008

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter
Issue I - May 2008

Got any suggestions?
— Add them here

Project News

One of the new aims of the project was to produce a monthly newsletter to be circulated to members. This is it!

Priorities are still being discussed; please join in at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire

Currently there are nine Yorkshire featured articles:

There are also seven featured lists:

List of York City F.C. Clubmen of the Year • List of York City F.C. managers • List of York City F.C. players • York City F.C. seasons • Bradford City A.F.C. seasons • List of York City F.C. statistics and records • Leeds United A.F.C. seasons

Thank you and well done to all those who contributed.

Kingston upon Hull was nominated for GA Status on April 28th

WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (3343 on April 27th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs. WP:YORKS is lacking in the area of GAs and falls well behind WP:LONDON. This topic was at the front of the new aims discussion and is an important issue for WP:YORKS.

As mentioned above, new aims have been decided. See the right hand column for more details.

Member News

There are now 45 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the 2 new members that have joined us since March:

Jetsetradio (talk · contribs)

Paulrach (talk · contribs)

No users left the WikiProject this month, but the list may need trimming to account for the one user who was permanently blocked and one who seems not to exist. There are also several who have not contributed to Misplaced Pages for some months.

The format of the member list has been altered to:

allow easier editing for new members
assist members to communicate more easily (by including members talk pages)
allow member to keep up to date with each other's contributions

Thanks

The Yorkshire Portal continues to be maintained by User:Kaly99. Many thanks.

A big "thank you" to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.

Written by User:Harkey Lodger • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View

Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

New Aims

After discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire.

Specific aims for the project are:-

To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles
To recruit more active editors
To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members

The top priority articles that have been identified to date and their current ratings are as follows -

Bradford - B
East Riding of Yorkshire - B
Henry Moore - FA - but would be demoted for lack of references if reviewed
Kingston upon Hull - B - informal Peer review comments on talk page
Leeds - B
North Yorkshire - Start
Ripon - B
Sheffield - FA
South Yorkshire - Start
Wakefield - Start
West Yorkshire - Start
William Wilberforce - GA - actively being worked on for FAC
York - B
Yorkshire - B
Yorkshire and the Humber - Start

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

Don't Forget...

Monitor
Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism can be removed as quickly as possible.

Images!
There is a shortage of good images in Yorkshire related articles, particularly on pages about smaller settlements. A good place to start would be the requested photographs category but please remember that there are many articles not within this category that have the same need.

Assessment
"Assess and review Assessment of Yorkshire related articles has been brought up to date recently, but needs constant maintenance.

Last but not Least...
Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is in permanent need of attention. Please take a look and see what you can do.

Delivered May 2008 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add two *'s by your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 10:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire - June 2008 Newsletter

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter
Issue 2 - June 2008

May issue

Got any suggestions?
— Add them here

Project News

Welcome to the second WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.

Priorities are still being discussed; please join in at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire

Currently there are ten Yorkshire featured articles:

Sheffield • History of Sheffield • Sheffield Wednesday F.C. • York City F.C. • M62 motorway • Henry Moore • George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore • Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. • Valley Parade • Caedmon

There are also seven featured lists:

Thank you and well done to all those who contributed.

Lealholm was nominated for GA Status on May 1st and has just received the review comments

Last of the Summer Wine proposed at FAC on May 22nd

History of Bradford City A.F.C. on peer review since May 29th

WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 3343 last month to 3509 on May 28th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs. WP:YORKS is lacking in the area of GAs and falls well behind WP:LONDON. This topic was at the front of the new aims discussion and is an important issue for WP:YORKS.

As mentioned above, new aims have been decided. See the right hand column for more details.

Member News

There are now 45 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the 4 new members that have joined us since the May newsletter:

ObscureFruits (talk · contribs)

Dr Greg (talk · contribs)

Johnbibby (talk · contribs)

Ahjet (talk · contribs)

No users left the WikiProject this month, but the list has been trimmed to account for the one user who was permanently blocked and one who seems not to exist. There are also several who have not contributed to Misplaced Pages for some months. However it is the exam season :-)

Retiono Virginian (talk · contribs) has been permanently blocked

and

Malcolm Bryant (talk · contribs) does not seem to have registered on Misplaced Pages.(Let me know if I am wrong.)

Last month the format of the member list was altered to:

allow easier editing for new members
assist members to communicate more easily (by including members talk pages)
allow members to keep up to date with each other's contributions

It had to be changed again before the May Newsletter went out to allow easier, more efficient, circulation by the ENewsBot. The Bot worked like magic last month but slightly complicated the signing up process, particularly for novice users.

Thanks

The Yorkshire Portal continues to be maintained by User:Kaly99 once again, thank you. There has been a number of suggestions on the ToDo list and this has been kept up to date too.

The Northallerton article has been greatly expanded by User:Yorkshiresky in the last month.

The football and rugby editors have to be congratulated for keeping abreast of most. if not all, of the top clubs.

User:Cyberdemon007 has made a lot of edits to North Yorkshire settlement infoboxes. Thank you.

There have been more WikiProkject Yorkshire editors on vandal patrol on watchlist , just lately. Thanks it's really good to know that you have others in support.

A big "thank you" to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed. If you patrol the recent changes regularly you "get to know" the editors and their specialities quite well.

Written by User:Harkey Lodger • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View

Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

New Aims

After discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire.

Specific aims for the project are:-

To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles
To recruit more active editors
To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members

The top priority articles that have been identified to date and their current ratings are as follows -

Bradford - B - some tidying up was done earlier in the month but much still to do.
East Riding of Yorkshire - B - See comments page

Henry Moore - FA - but would be demoted for lack of references if reviewed.
Kingston upon Hull - B - informal Peer review comments on talk page. Has gone to WP:GA review and is awaiting result.
Leeds - B -has been really improved lately but suffers from ISP edits. Well done to editors who keep on top of them.
North Yorkshire - Start
Ripon - B - See comments page
Sheffield - FA -Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Sheffield seem to be keeping an eye on this, their flagship article.
South Yorkshire - Start
Wakefield - Start
West Yorkshire - Start
William Wilberforce - GA - actively being worked on for FAC
York - B - Main problems are lack of references and the lists, also the external links section would need a major prune before a GA review.Maybe ask for peer review when these are done? Bath, Somerset is an FA and a good role model.
Yorkshire - B - see talk page for discussions on this.
Yorkshire and the Humber - Start. The article has been reorganised and expanded (some sections with no text are there on the source page but are commented out at the moment). It could do with more citations.

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

Don't Forget...

Monitor
Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism can be removed as quickly as possible.

Images!
There is a shortage of good images in Yorkshire related articles, particularly on pages about smaller settlements. A good place to start would be the requested photographs category but please remember that there are many articles not within this category that have the same need. A good old holiday picture of The Spa, Bridlington would be a useful addition to the article.

Assessment
"Assess and review Assessment of Yorkshire related articles has been brought up to date recently, but needs constant maintenance.

Last but not Least...
Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is in permanent need of attention. Please take a look and see what you can do. One small edit each session would make a big difference.

Yorkshire articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	Other	???	Total
FA	2	1	15	60				78
FL			1	16				17
GA	2	7	36	178				223
B	9	67	137	373				586
C	5	144	303	1,519				1,971
Start	1	242	1,259	8,704				10,206
Stub		21	352	5,658	3			6,034
List		4	12	983				999
Category					3,918	1		3,919
Disambig					21			21
File					22			22
Portal					95			95
Project					127			127
Redirect			2	197	1,362			1,561
Template					622			622
NA					1			1
Other					9			9
Assessed	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1		26,491
Unassessed							1	1
Total	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1	1	26,492
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 97,304			Ω = 5.10

Delivered June 2008 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add two *'s by your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Newsletter - July 2008

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter
Issue 3 - July 2008

June issue

Got any suggestions?
— Add them here

Project News

Welcome to the third WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.

Priorities are still being discussed; please join in at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire

Currently there are ten Yorkshire featured articles:

There are also eight featured lists:

Thank you and well done to all those who contributed.

Article Activity

Sam Cowan was nominated for GA Status on May 12th and is on hold from June 23rd

Last of the Summer Wine was not promoted to FA on June 12th

Kingston upon Hull was not promoted to GA status on June 10th after a re-review

Portal:Yorkshire on peer review since June 17th

Scarborough F.C. seasons was promoted to FL status on June 25th

Lealholm was not promoted to GA status on June 30th

WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 3509 last month to 3635 on June 29th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs. WP:YORKS is lacking in the area of GAs and falls well behind WP:LONDON. This topic was at the front of the new aims discussion and is an important issue for WP:YORKS.

Member News

There are now 47 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the 3 new members that have joined us since the June newsletter:

almost-instinct (talk · contribs)

A1personage (talk · contribs)

Mtaylor848 (talk · contribs)

No users left the WikiProject this month, but 1 user was registered twice under different logins and has been consolidated.

Thanks

The Yorkshire Portal continues to be maintained by User:Kaly99 once again, thank you. User:Kaly99 would very much appreciate comments at peer review. There has been a number of suggestions on the ToDo list and this has been kept up to date too.

The football and rugby editors have to be congratulated for keeping abreast of most, if not all, of the top clubs. Also for getting Scarborough F.C. seasons to FL status during the month.

There have been even more WikiProkject Yorkshire editors on vandal patrol on watchlist. Thanks it's really good to know that you have others in support.

A big "thank you" to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed. If you patrol the recent changes regularly you "get to know" the editors and their specialities quite well.

Yorkshire articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	Other	???	Total
FA	2	1	15	60				78
FL			1	16				17
GA	2	7	36	178				223
B	9	67	137	373				586
C	5	144	303	1,519				1,971
Start	1	242	1,259	8,704				10,206
Stub		21	352	5,658	3			6,034
List		4	12	983				999
Category					3,918	1		3,919
Disambig					21			21
File					22			22
Portal					95			95
Project					127			127
Redirect			2	197	1,362			1,561
Template					622			622
NA					1			1
Other					9			9
Assessed	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1		26,491
Unassessed							1	1
Total	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1	1	26,492
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 97,304			Ω = 5.10

Written by User:Harkey Lodger • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View

Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

New Aims

After discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire.

Specific aims for the project are:-

To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles
To recruit more active editors
To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members

Priority Articles

The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows -

Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

**Informal article viewing and editing statistics for 5 of our priority articles**
Article	Viewing statistics
*York	Rated a B class article. Viewed 40,122 times in May, 2008. Only went below 1,000 viewings on one day, 10th, and achieved 1,600 on the 6th and the 20th. Overall total number of edits 1,818 with 46 in May, 2008.
*Kingston upon Hull	Rated a B class article. Viewed 38,018 times in May, 2008. On 12 days there were over 1,000 viewings with a sudden peak of 4,200 on the 24th. Overall number of edits 2,269 with 88 in May, 2008.
*Leeds	Rated a B class article. The highest number of monthly viewings for our priority articles at 50,846 for the month of May, 2008. There were consistently over 1,000 daily viewings with a high of 2,000 on the 25th. Overall total number of edits 3,152 with 86 in May, 2008.
*Sheffield	Rated an FA class article.Viewed 37,740 times in May, 2008 with usually over 1,000 daily viewings. There were 6 days when over 1,400 viewings were made then a low of 900 on the 10th. Overall total number of edits 2,550 with 44 in May, 2008.
*William Wilberforce	Rated a GA class article and actively being worked on for FAC. Viewed 42,902 times in May, 2008. Consistently over 1,000 daily viewings with 2,000 viewings on the 12th. Overall total number of edits 2,434 with 241 in May, 2008.

Tools used to get these statistics were:-

Don't Forget...

Monitor
Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism can be removed as quickly as possible.

Images!
There is a shortage of good images in Yorkshire related articles, particularly on pages about smaller settlements. A good place to start would be the requested photographs category but please remember that there are many articles not within this category that have the same need. A good old holiday picture of The Spa, Bridlington would be a useful addition to the article.

Assessment
"Assess and review Assessment of Yorkshire related articles has been brought up to date recently, but needs constant maintenance.

Last but not Least...
Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is in permanent need of attention. Please take a look and see what you can do. One small edit each session would make a big difference.

Delivered July 2008 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add two *'s by your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 12:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - August 2008

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter
Issue 4 - August 2008

July issue

Got any suggestions?
— Add them here

Project News

Welcome to the fourth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.

Priorities are not set in stone and if you would like to discuss changes, please join in at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire

Currently there are eleven Yorkshire featured articles:

There are also eight featured lists:

Thank you and well done to all those who contributed.

Article Activity

Sam Cowan was promoted to GA Status on July 2nd

Jimmy Speirs was nominated for GA on July 5th

Herbert Chapman has had a peer review

Brian Close was demoted from FA on July 7th

History of Bradford City A.F.C. on peer review since July 16th

Bradford City A.F.C. season 2007–08 was promoted to GA Status on July 17th

William Wilberforce was promoted to FA status on July 18th

Battle of Boroughbridge was promoted to GA on July 25th

WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 3635 last month to 3781 on July 30th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 24 out of a total number of 1624 articles. In the area of GAs, at 17, WP:YORKS falls behind WP:LONDON and WP:GM who each have 21.

Member News

There are now 47 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new member that has joined us since the July newsletter:

BulldozerD11 (talk · contribs)

One user left the WikiProject this month:

Qst (talk · contribs)

Thanks

User:Kaly99 would very much appreciate comments about Yorkshire Portal at peer review which continues to be maintained by Kaly99. Once more, thank you.

There has been a number of suggestions on the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal and this has been kept up to date too.

The football and rugby editors have to be admired for keeping abreast of most, if not all, of the top clubs.

WikiProkject Yorkshire editors have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist. Thanks.

A big "thank you" to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.

Yorkshire articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	Other	???	Total
FA	2	1	15	60				78
FL			1	16				17
GA	2	7	36	178				223
B	9	67	137	373				586
C	5	144	303	1,519				1,971
Start	1	242	1,259	8,704				10,206
Stub		21	352	5,658	3			6,034
List		4	12	983				999
Category					3,918	1		3,919
Disambig					21			21
File					22			22
Portal					95			95
Project					127			127
Redirect			2	197	1,362			1,561
Template					622			622
NA					1			1
Other					9			9
Assessed	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1		26,491
Unassessed							1	1
Total	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1	1	26,492
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 97,304			Ω = 5.10

Written by User:Harkey Lodger • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View

Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

New Aims

After discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008.

Specific aims for the project are:-

To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below)
To recruit more active editors (See Member News above)
To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members

Priority Articles

The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows -

Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

Article improvement

One of the aims of our project was to set up a periodic Article improvement drive. The article on our county town of York is suggested for this month. Please discuss and/or make edits to move towards WP:GA? status for our first selected article.

Please remember...

The project is now subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.

Monitor
Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.

Infoboxes
Many of our articles would benefit from the addition of an appropriate infobox. Useful ones include:

Template:Infobox Artifact e.g. Coppergate Helmet

Template:Infobox Person e.g. Bill Gates

Template:Infobox Musical artist

Template:Infobox Company

Template:Infobox Defunct company

Template:Infobox Hiking trail

Template:Infobox Football club

Template:Infobox Football biography

Template:Infobox church

Template:Infobox UK school

Template:Infobox Museum e.g. Rotunda Museum

Template:Infobox UK place

Template:UK road routebox e.g.A1 road (Great Britain)

Template:Infobox park

Template:Infobox UKproperty e.g. Nunnington Hall

Assessment
Assess and review Assessment of Yorkshire related articles has been revised recently due to new classes being added by the Misplaced Pages:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team
The changes are:
- The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
- The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
- A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

References
Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference.

Moves
Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.

Delivered August 2008 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add two *'s by your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 23:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Jake_Burns.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jake_Burns.gif, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:43, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:DBryan.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:DBryan.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 23:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:SLFImage4.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:SLFImage4.gif, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:USMCCorporal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:USMCCorporal.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 06:57, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - September 2008

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter
Issue 5 - September 2008

August issue

Got any suggestions?
— Add them here

Project News

Welcome to the fifth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.

WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 3781 last month to 4005 on August 27th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 25 out of a total number of 1664 articles. In the area of GAs, at 17, WP:YORKS falls behind WP:GM with 27 and WP:LONDON with 22.

Priorities are not set in stone and if you would like to discuss changes, please join in at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire

Currently there are twelve Yorkshire featured articles:

There are also eight featured lists:

Thank you and well done to all those who contributed.

Article Activity

Jimmy Speirs was promoted to GA Status on July 22nd

Henry Moore is on FAR since August 15th

Battle of Marston Moor on peer review since August 22nd

KitKat Crescent on peer review since August 22nd

History of Bradford City A.F.C. was promoted to FA Status on August 25th

Last of the Summer Wine nominated at FAC on August 27th

Chris Brandonwas promoted to GA Status on August 27th

Member News

There are now 48 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that has joined us since the August newsletter:

Evil Eye (talk · contribs)
Leo1802 (talk · contribs)

One user in the WikiProject was banned this month:

Yorkshirian (talk · contribs)

Thanks

To those who have been tagging articles this month, the number of articles has now gone over the 4,000 mark.

There has been a number of suggestions on the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal and this has been kept up to date too.

The football and rugby editors have to be admired for keeping abreast of most, if not all, of the top clubs.

WikiProkject Yorkshire editors have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist. Thanks.

A big "thank you" to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.

Yorkshire articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	Other	???	Total
FA	2	1	15	60				78
FL			1	16				17
GA	2	7	36	178				223
B	9	67	137	373				586
C	5	144	303	1,519				1,971
Start	1	242	1,259	8,704				10,206
Stub		21	352	5,658	3			6,034
List		4	12	983				999
Category					3,918	1		3,919
Disambig					21			21
File					22			22
Portal					95			95
Project					127			127
Redirect			2	197	1,362			1,561
Template					622			622
NA					1			1
Other					9			9
Assessed	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1		26,491
Unassessed							1	1
Total	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1	1	26,492
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 97,304			Ω = 5.10

Written by Kaly99/Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View

Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

New Aims

After discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008.

Specific aims for the project are:-

To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below)
To recruit more active editors (See Member News above)
To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members

Yorkshire Portal

The Yorkshire portal helps people navigate through the content related to Yorkshire. The highlighted content is displayed randomly and includes -

Did you Knows
Articles
Biographies
Pictures
Panoramas

Any additions to these would be great. The portal is being prepared for featured portal candidacy so help meeting the criteria, for example, copy-editing or suggestions for new content sections such as Selected anniversaries, On this day, or In the news would be appreciated.

Priority Articles

The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows -

Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

Please remember...

The project is now subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.

Monitor
Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.

Infoboxes
Many of our articles would benefit from the addition of an appropriate infobox.

Assessment
Assess and review Assessment of Yorkshire related articles has been revised recently due to new classes being added by the Misplaced Pages:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team
The changes are:
- The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
- The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
- A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

References
Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference.

Moves
Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.

Delivered September 2008 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add two *'s by your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 10:11, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - October 2008

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter
Issue 6 - October 2008

September issue

Got any suggestions?
— Add them here

Project News

Welcome to the sixth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.

WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 4005 last month to 4085 on September 27th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 28 out of a total number of 1678 articles. In the area of GAs, at 21, WP:YORKS also falls behind WP:GM with 28.

Priorities are not set in stone and if you would like to discuss changes, please join in at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire

Currently there are thirteen Yorkshire featured articles:

There are also eight featured lists:

Thank you and well done to all those who contributed.

Article Activity

Last of the Summer Wine was promoted to FA Status on September 9th
Curtis Woodhouse was nominated for GA Status on September 18th
Henry Moore retained its FA Status after FAR on September 25th

Member News

There are now 51 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that has joined us since the September newsletter:

Thanks

There has been a number of suggestions on the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal and this has been kept up to date too.

The football and rugby editors have to be admired for keeping abreast of most, if not all, of the top clubs.

WikiProkject Yorkshire editors have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist. Thanks.

A big "thank you" to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.

Priority Articles

The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows -

Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

Yorkshire articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	Other	???	Total
FA	2	1	15	60				78
FL			1	16				17
GA	2	7	36	178				223
B	9	67	137	373				586
C	5	144	303	1,519				1,971
Start	1	242	1,259	8,704				10,206
Stub		21	352	5,658	3			6,034
List		4	12	983				999
Category					3,918	1		3,919
Disambig					21			21
File					22			22
Portal					95			95
Project					127			127
Redirect			2	197	1,362			1,561
Template					622			622
NA					1			1
Other					9			9
Assessed	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1		26,491
Unassessed							1	1
Total	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1	1	26,492
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 97,304			Ω = 5.10

Written by Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View

Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

New Aims

After discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008.

Specific aims for the project are:-

To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below)
To recruit more active editors (See Member News above)
To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members

Misplaced Pages DVD version 0.7

Misplaced Pages DVD Version 0.7 aims to be a collection of around 30,000 articles taken from the English version of Misplaced Pages. The process of producing the list of articles for the DVD is currently under way and 43 of the project's articles are being considered for inclusion. The list of selected Yorkshire articles can be seen here.

The selection has been done using a scoring system depending on the project's assessment, the number of incoming links to the article, the number of interwiki links the article has and the number of times the article has been viewed.

The process of selecting clean versions for each of the selected articles is also being undertaken so that vandalised versions are not put on the DVD. Some of the articles also have clean-up tags attached to them which need to be dealt with before a version can be used on the DVD. It would be good if members could address any tags in the selected articles and fix the problem identified. Those articles that are tagged by multiple projects should get a visit by each of the projects involved so the articles will probably get a lot of activity in the next few days.

The cut-off date for this work is October 20th, but changes to articles following version selection may not be incorporated as there may not be time to reassess them.

Please remember...

The project is now subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.

Monitor
Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.

Infoboxes
Many of our articles would benefit from the addition of an appropriate infobox.

Assessment
Assess and review Assessment of Yorkshire related articles has been revised recently due to new classes being added by the Misplaced Pages:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team
The changes are:
- The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
- The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
- A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

References
Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference.

Moves
Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.

Delivered October 2008 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - October 2008

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter
Issue 6 - October 2008

September issue

Got any suggestions?
— Add them here

Project News

Welcome to the sixth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.

WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 4005 last month to 4085 on September 27th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 28 out of a total number of 1678 articles. In the area of GAs, at 21, WP:YORKS also falls behind WP:GM with 28.

Priorities are not set in stone and if you would like to discuss changes, please join in at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire

Currently there are thirteen Yorkshire featured articles:

There are also eight featured lists:

Thank you and well done to all those who contributed.

Article Activity

Member News

There are now 51 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that has joined us since the September newsletter:

Thanks

There has been a number of suggestions on the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal and this has been kept up to date too.

The football and rugby editors have to be admired for keeping abreast of most, if not all, of the top clubs.

WikiProkject Yorkshire editors have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist. Thanks.

A big "thank you" to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.

Priority Articles

The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows -

Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

Yorkshire articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	Other	???	Total
FA	2	1	15	60				78
FL			1	16				17
GA	2	7	36	178				223
B	9	67	137	373				586
C	5	144	303	1,519				1,971
Start	1	242	1,259	8,704				10,206
Stub		21	352	5,658	3			6,034
List		4	12	983				999
Category					3,918	1		3,919
Disambig					21			21
File					22			22
Portal					95			95
Project					127			127
Redirect			2	197	1,362			1,561
Template					622			622
NA					1			1
Other					9			9
Assessed	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1		26,491
Unassessed							1	1
Total	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1	1	26,492
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 97,304			Ω = 5.10

Written by Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View

Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

New Aims

After discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008.

Specific aims for the project are:-

To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below)
To recruit more active editors (See Member News above)
To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members

Misplaced Pages DVD version 0.7

The cut-off date for this work is October 20th, but changes to articles following version selection may not be incorporated as there may not be time to reassess them.

Please remember...

The project is now subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.

Monitor
Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.

Infoboxes
Many of our articles would benefit from the addition of an appropriate infobox.

Assessment
Assess and review Assessment of Yorkshire related articles has been revised recently due to new classes being added by the Misplaced Pages:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team
The changes are:
- The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
- The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
- A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

References
Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference.

Moves
Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.

Delivered October 2008 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:03, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - October 2008

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter
Issue 6 - October 2008

September issue

Got any suggestions?
— Add them here

Project News

Welcome to the sixth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.

WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 4005 last month to 4085 on September 27th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 28 out of a total number of 1678 articles. In the area of GAs, at 21, WP:YORKS also falls behind WP:GM with 28.

Priorities are not set in stone and if you would like to discuss changes, please join in at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire

Currently there are thirteen Yorkshire featured articles:

There are also eight featured lists:

Thank you and well done to all those who contributed.

Article Activity

Member News

There are now 51 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that has joined us since the September newsletter:

Thanks

There has been a number of suggestions on the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal and this has been kept up to date too.

The football and rugby editors have to be admired for keeping abreast of most, if not all, of the top clubs.

WikiProkject Yorkshire editors have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist. Thanks.

A big "thank you" to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.

Priority Articles

The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows -

Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

Yorkshire articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	Other	???	Total
FA	2	1	15	60				78
FL			1	16				17
GA	2	7	36	178				223
B	9	67	137	373				586
C	5	144	303	1,519				1,971
Start	1	242	1,259	8,704				10,206
Stub		21	352	5,658	3			6,034
List		4	12	983				999
Category					3,918	1		3,919
Disambig					21			21
File					22			22
Portal					95			95
Project					127			127
Redirect			2	197	1,362			1,561
Template					622			622
NA					1			1
Other					9			9
Assessed	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1		26,491
Unassessed							1	1
Total	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1	1	26,492
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 97,304			Ω = 5.10

Written by Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View

Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

New Aims

After discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008.

Specific aims for the project are:-

To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below)
To recruit more active editors (See Member News above)
To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members

Misplaced Pages DVD version 0.7

The cut-off date for this work is October 20th, but changes to articles following version selection may not be incorporated as there may not be time to reassess them.

Please remember...

The project is now subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.

Monitor
Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.

Infoboxes
Many of our articles would benefit from the addition of an appropriate infobox.

Assessment
Assess and review Assessment of Yorkshire related articles has been revised recently due to new classes being added by the Misplaced Pages:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team
The changes are:
- The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
- The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
- A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

References
Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference.

Moves
Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.

Delivered October 2008 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - November 2008

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter
Issue 7 - November 2008

October issue

Got any suggestions?
— Add them here

Project News

Welcome to the seventh WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.

WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 4085 last month to 4284 on October 27th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 29 out of a total number of 1708 articles. In the area of GAs, at 24, WP:YORKS also falls behind WP:GM with 30.

Priorities are not set in stone and if you would like to discuss changes, please join in at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire

Currently there are thirteen Yorkshire featured articles:

There are also eight featured lists:

Thank you and well done to all those who contributed.

Article Activity

Northallerton was promoted to GA Status on October 6th
Curtis Woodhouse was promoted to GA Status on October 7th
Hebden, North Yorkshire was promoted to GA Status on October 30th

Member News

There are now 51 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that have joined us since the October newsletter:

Petripavlovian (talk · contribs)

One member left the project this month:

Adambro (talk · contribs)

Thanks

Misplaced Pages DVD version 0.7

As mentioned in the October newsletter, Misplaced Pages DVD Version 0.7, which aims to be a collection of around 30,000 articles taken from the English version of Misplaced Pages needed work to prepare 43 of the project's articles for the DVD. The process of producing the list of articles for the DVD is now completed and thanks are due to the many members who made a contribution to the effort. The list of selected Yorkshire articles can be seen here.

The selection was done using a scoring system depending on the project's assessment, the number of incoming links to the article, the number of interwiki links the article had and the number of times the article had been viewed.

Only two of our top priority articles were not selected, Ripon and Wakefield, the others were cleaned up, improved, expanded and copyedited as far as time allowed.

There has again been a number of suggestions on the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal and this has been kept up to date.

The football and rugby editors have continued keeping abreast of most, if not all, of the top clubs.

WikiProkject Yorkshire editors have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist. Thanks.

A big "thank you" to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.

Priority Articles

The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows -

Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

Yorkshire articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	Other	???	Total
FA	2	1	15	60				78
FL			1	16				17
GA	2	7	36	178				223
B	9	67	137	373				586
C	5	144	303	1,519				1,971
Start	1	242	1,259	8,704				10,206
Stub		21	352	5,658	3			6,034
List		4	12	983				999
Category					3,918	1		3,919
Disambig					21			21
File					22			22
Portal					95			95
Project					127			127
Redirect			2	197	1,362			1,561
Template					622			622
NA					1			1
Other					9			9
Assessed	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1		26,491
Unassessed							1	1
Total	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1	1	26,492
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 97,304			Ω = 5.10

New Aims

After discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008.

Specific aims for the project are:-

To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below)
To recruit more active editors (See Member News above)
To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members

Missing co-ordinates

A recent entry on the project talk page Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire#Missing coordinates alerted us to the fact that many of our articles do not display any geographical co-ordinates. Many also do not have infoboxes. As locational infoboxes usually have a field for co-ordinates, it was suggested that members might be able to kill two birds with one stone by adding an appropriate infobox at the same time as co-ordinates.

Appropriate locational infoboxes include:

The infobox page usually includes detailed instructions for its use and many of the fields are not mandatory so are not displayed until information is entered.

The geographical co-ordinates for a location can be found on Google Earth.

Open Google Earth and enter the name of the location in the search box. (Quite often the article name can be copied and pasted directly into the search box but sometimes it is useful to add ,UK to the address.)
A results list is displayed beneath the search box.
Click on the right one.
Zoom in to check that the correct feature is being displayed on the image. (Sometimes the supposed feature is not at the centre of the page.)
Place the pointer over the location on the screen image and read the geographical co-ordinates from the panel at the bottom of the screen.
Make a note of the co-ordinates.
Open the tab of the article you are editing and add the co-ordinates in the co-ords field.

Further information can be found at Misplaced Pages:Obtaining geographic coordinates.

Once co-ordinates have been added the template {{coord missing}} should be removed from the article.

Please remember...

The project is now subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.

Monitor
Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.

Infoboxes
Many of our articles would benefit from the addition of an appropriate infobox.

Assessment
Assess and review Assessment of Yorkshire related articles has been revised recently due to new classes being added by the Misplaced Pages:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team
The changes are:
- The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
- The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
- A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

References
Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference.

Moves
Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.

Written by Harkey & Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View

Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

Delivered November 2008 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 06:12, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - December 2008

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter
Issue 8 - December 2008

November issue

Got any suggestions?
— Add them here

File:Christmas tree.gif

Project News

Welcome to the seventh WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.

WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 4284 last month to 4532 on November 27th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 29 out of a total number of 1746 articles. In the area of GAs, at 24, WP:YORKS also falls behind WP:GM with 31.

Priorities are not set in stone and if you would like to discuss changes, please join in at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire

Currently there are thirteen Yorkshire featured articles:

There are also eight featured lists:

Thank you and well done to all those who contributed.

Article Activity

Geoff Horsfield was nominated at GA on November 16th
M62 motorway on FAR on November 26th

Member News

There are now 52 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that have joined us since the November newsletter:

Zolstijers (talk · contribs)

No members left the project this month:

Misplaced Pages DVD version 0.7

Since the last newsletter Northallerton has also been selected to go onto the DVD having recently achieved GA status.

Thanks

Thanks for all those who have been adding co-ordinate information to articles as a result of last month's newsletter. The major impact has been on the railway station articles, including disused ones, but other location articles have also been tackled. This effort means that the articles can be accessed directly from external sources such as Google maps and gives them a much higher profile.

There has again been a number of suggestions on the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal and this has been kept up to date.

The football and rugby editors have continued keeping abreast of most, if not all, of the top clubs.

WikiProkject Yorkshire editors have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist. Thanks.

A big "thank you" to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.

Priority Articles

The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows -

Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

Yorkshire articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	Other	???	Total
FA	2	1	15	60				78
FL			1	16				17
GA	2	7	36	178				223
B	9	67	137	373				586
C	5	144	303	1,519				1,971
Start	1	242	1,259	8,704				10,206
Stub		21	352	5,658	3			6,034
List		4	12	983				999
Category					3,918	1		3,919
Disambig					21			21
File					22			22
Portal					95			95
Project					127			127
Redirect			2	197	1,362			1,561
Template					622			622
NA					1			1
Other					9			9
Assessed	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1		26,491
Unassessed							1	1
Total	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1	1	26,492
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 97,304			Ω = 5.10

New Aims

After discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008.

Specific aims for the project are:-

To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below)
To recruit more active editors (See Member News above)
To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members

Co-ordinates

Just to let you know that a bot is currently sub-dividing the articles with missing co-ordinate data into sub-categories for ease of use. You can now find the articles by looking at the categories for each area as — East, North, South and West. From the discussions it looks like only the co-ordinates in the title area are being used by external sites so articles with multiple co-ordinates are not being handled correctly as yet.

Happy Christmas

Just to say thanks for all the effort put in by members on articles covering the Yorkshire area and to wish everyone a happy Christmas. It is time to take a break and to spend some time with family and friends. May be even to indulge yourself in the food and drink that abounds at this time of year or even make that occasional visit to a church. What ever you do over the festive season enjoy it and see you next year.

Though if you are at a loose end then many of you will be getting some new toys to play with which can be used to enhance wiki articles. Those new digital cameras can be used to get photographs for some of the articles which are currently without and for which the Geograph site has nothing suitable. May be it is a new PC that you just need to play with then spend some time checking out the watchlist for vandalism which tends to go unnoticed when there are fewer regular editors around. It may even be a book which can be used to add references to an article. May be you want to do something different then try creating spoken articles see the Spoken article project.

The project is now subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.

Monitor
Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.

Infoboxes
Many of our articles would benefit from the addition of an appropriate infobox.

Assessment
Assess and review Assessment of Yorkshire related articles has been revised recently due to new classes being added by the Misplaced Pages:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team
The changes are:
- The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
- The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
- A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

References
Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference.

Moves
Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.

Written by Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View

Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

Delivered December 2008 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 00:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - January 2009

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter
Issue 9 - January 2009

December issue

Got any suggestions?
— Add them here

Project News

Welcome to the ninth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.

WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 4532 last month to 4822 on December 19th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 29 out of a total number of 1763 articles. In the area of GAs, at 25, WP:YORKS also falls behind WP:GM with 36.

Priorities are not set in stone and if you would like to discuss changes, please join in at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire

Currently there are thirteen Yorkshire featured articles:

There are also eight featured lists:

Thank you and well done to all those who contributed.

Article Activity

Geoff Horsfield was promoted to GA on December 3rd

Member News

There are now 54 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that have joined us since the December newsletter:

Euchiasmus (talk · contribs)
Chemical Engineer (talk · contribs)

No members left the project this month:

Thanks

Thanks for all those who have been adding co-ordinate information to articles as a result of last month's newsletter. The major impact has been on the railway station articles, including disused ones, but other location articles have also been tackled. This effort means that the articles can be accessed directly from external sources such as Google maps and gives them a much higher profile.

There has again been a number of suggestions on the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal and this has been kept up to date.

The football and rugby editors have continued keeping abreast of most, if not all, of the top clubs.

WikiProkject Yorkshire editors have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist. Thanks.

A big "thank you" to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.

Priority Articles

The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows -

Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

Yorkshire articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	Other	???	Total
FA	2	1	15	60				78
FL			1	16				17
GA	2	7	36	178				223
B	9	67	137	373				586
C	5	144	303	1,519				1,971
Start	1	242	1,259	8,704				10,206
Stub		21	352	5,658	3			6,034
List		4	12	983				999
Category					3,918	1		3,919
Disambig					21			21
File					22			22
Portal					95			95
Project					127			127
Redirect			2	197	1,362			1,561
Template					622			622
NA					1			1
Other					9			9
Assessed	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1		26,491
Unassessed							1	1
Total	19	486	2,117	17,688	6,180	1	1	26,492
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 97,304			Ω = 5.10

New Aims

After discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008.

Specific aims for the project are:-

To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below)
To recruit more active editors (See Member News above)
To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members

Citations

Citations are a necessity to give credence to the articles that we produce, so that the facts given can be verified. One of the templates that is used for this is {{Cite book}} to give details of books used for creating the articles. There has been some changes to the template that we should be aware of and make changes accordingly when editing articles. The id= field should no longer be used to give the ISBN number for a book instead use the isbn= parameter. The page= and pages= parameters now have the p. or pp. automatically inserted and so we should just put the page number in the fields. Use page= for a single page and pages= for multiple pages. If the insertion of p. or pp. is not required then use nopp=true to suppress this. Note that the number of pages in a book is not specified using these fields and at the moment a new parameter is being discussed to cover this.

Happy New Year

Hope everyone enjoyed the festive season and are not feeling too worse for ware. At the start of a new year we all look back at what has happened in the last year and look forward to the coming year. It is time to take stock of what has happened in the last year well we have managed to get some priority articles selected and to get this newsletter in place to keep members up to date on what is happening. Articles have been tagged and assessed, a watchlist of these has been set up for members to keep track of changes to those articles that the project is interested in. So over all great steps have been made in the last year and thanks to everyone for the efforts put in. Looking forward it is time to make some targets for the coming year. If anyone has any ideas for what we should be doing in the coming year then please share them on the project talk page.

The project is now subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.

Monitor
Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.

Infoboxes
Many of our articles would benefit from the addition of an appropriate infobox.

Assessment
Assess and review Assessment of Yorkshire related articles has been revised recently due to new classes being added by the Misplaced Pages:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team
The changes are:
- The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
- The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
- A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

References
Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference.

Moves
Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.

Written by Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View

Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

Delivered January 2009 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:53, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Source for members of Parliament

Hi. I was actually looking for Samuel B. Kent and stumbled upon Samuel Kent, an article you created. I noticed that the only source it had was a dead link, so I took it upon myself to find a replacement and did.

On the off-chance that you have a particular interest in bios of 18th century MPs, you may find this to be helpful:

Robert Beatson, A Chronological Register of Both Houses of the British Parliament, from the Union in 1708, to the Third Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, in 1807: From the Union in 1708, to the Third Parliament Of the United Kingdom Of Great Britain and Ireland in 1807, Volume 1, printed for Longman, Hurst, Rees, and Orme by J. Chalmers & Co., 1807; Chronological Register of Both Houses of the British Parliament at Google Books (PDF)

Cheers. TJRC (talk) 21:03, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Staffsergbrit.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Staffsergbrit.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 21:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Erdem Artun

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Erdem Artun, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

has never played in a fully professional league. Fails WP:ATHLETE. Filling in the blanks from this page, this site states he never played for Darlington

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stu.W UK (talk) 04:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adem Atay

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Adem Atay, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Never played professional football, fails WP:ATHLETE

Speedy deletion nomination of James Lindsay, 5th Earl of Balcarres

A tag has been placed on James Lindsay, 5th Earl of Balcarres requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. NW (Talk) 19:25, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alexander Lindsay, 4th Earl of Balcarres

A tag has been placed on Alexander Lindsay, 4th Earl of Balcarres requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

Clarificatoin

Don't copy-and-paste stuff from other sites (such as thepeerage). It will get you blocked if you persist. Understand?DS (talk) 19:29, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Jcuk. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions in relation to Misplaced Pages's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. --NW (Talk) 19:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Regarding your comment to DS's user talk

Um, how about not please? Dragonfly could have been a bit politer, yes. But your post wasn't exactly the epitome of politeness either. In addition, any sort of text dump, even if you wikify it, is a copyright violation and is forbidden by Misplaced Pages policy. NW (Talk) 23:03, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Richard le Scrope

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Richard le Scrope, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://english.cua.edu/faculty/wright/biograph.cfm (wayback confirms their prior: http://web.archive.org/web/20040627150653/http://english.cua.edu/faculty/wright/biograph.cfm), and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Richard le Scrope and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Richard le Scrope, in your email. See Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Richard le Scrope with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Richard le Scrope. See Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Misplaced Pages article layout. For more information on Misplaced Pages's policies, see Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Richard le Scrope saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Misplaced Pages. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl 19:39, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Valle Crucis Abbey seems to be a copyright violation was well. Material was previously published at , as confirmed by the internet archives: . --Moonriddengirl 19:45, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Dave Sharp is also now blanked. --Moonriddengirl 22:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)