Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PAVA11 (talk | contribs) at 15:08, 27 December 2009 (→User:Epeefleche reported by User:Grsz11 (Result: ): +). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

Click here to create a new report

User:Historiographer reported by User:kingsfall (Result: )

Page: Japan–Korea disputes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
User being reported: Historiographer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert: 2009-12-24T12:51:07 (UTC)
• 2nd revert: 2009-12-24T09:05:28 (UTC)
• 3rd revert: 2009-12-21T09:54:34 (UTC)
• 4th revert: 2009-12-20T11:44:45 (UTC)
• 5th revert: 2009-12-12T16:08:11 (UTC)
• 6th revert: 2009-12-07T09:19:52 (UTC)
• 7th revert: 2009-11-30T08:55:34 (UTC) sourced provided http://100.naver.com/100.nhn?docid=144836
• 8th revert: 2009-11-23T08:50:42 (UTC)
• 9th revert: 2009-11-19T04:31:37 (UTC)
• Note - the malformed report with no time stamp filed by User:Kingfall is implemented by me.--Caspian blue 21:29, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: link Note bogus 3RR warning (warning to totally different editor given by also another editor). --Caspian blue 21:29, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:
The user has made it clear in his editing comments he has no intention of discussing said edit on the talk page, despite repeated requests from the user he has been warring with (not myself). Based upon the comments he has left in his edits, he does not seem to be fluent in English. I have not warned the user as I am unsure how the warning system works.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingsfall (talk • contribs) 2009-12-24T20:05:07 (UTC)

• Comment; Kingsfall (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) clearly malformed the report by listing the spurious diffs as if the accused like reverting endlessly the article within 24 hours. As a matter of fact, Historiographer reverted two times in 24 hours so did Kingsfall; they reverted each other over which organization led the Korean independence movement. User:Kingsfall's clear engagement in edit warring seems purely to be on half of 青鬼よし (talk · contribs) with just his/her personal assertion (which is WP:Original research). So Kingsfall's blind edit warring and this report here can be construed as bad faith behavior and gaming the system to block Historiographer.

1st revert 2009-12-24T09:42:27 (UTC)

2nd revert 2009-12-24T19:43:02 (UTC)

• Kingsfall has neither engaged in discussion nor provided sources unlike his edit summaries and argument here. 青鬼よし did not bring in any source while Historiographer already gave a source for his edit according to this edit. However, 青鬼よし rejected it and then continues edit warring. Moreover, if Kingsfall wants to blame the tendentious edit warring, the user should've reported 青鬼よし first who not only initiated the edit warring at Japan-Korea disputes but also reverted 3 times over 3 different articles from Dec.20 to today.3RR warning 1warning 2warning 3 Kingsfall also did not do anything to resolve the issue nor gave Historiographer any single warning but directly jumped to frame his opponent. Moreover, if you look at the article history, 青鬼よし reverted the most than any other editors engaged in editing the article. The general reason that such edit warring occurs is that 青鬼よし has a tendency of distorting sources and history or misreading sources with his poor language ability. Also see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Azukimonaka.--Caspian blue 21:29, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

User:青鬼よし's reverts only regarding Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea

Page: Japan–Korea disputes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
User being reported: 青鬼よし (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
With the same logic of Kingfall, I'm listing the all reverts by 青鬼よし regarding Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea. However, 青鬼よし's tendentious revert campaign and false edits are not limited to these reverts.

• 1st revert 2009-11-18T12:19:20
• 2nd revert 2009-11-23T02:04:19
• 3rd revert 2009-11-29T10:27:36
• 4th revert 2009-12-06T04:28:23
• 5th revert 2009-12-12T14:25:29
• 6th revert 2009-12-20T06:02:57
• 7th revert 2009-12-20T08:05:21
• 8th revert 2009-12-20T11:55:51
• 9th revert 2009-12-24T01:45:02

--Caspian blue 21:29, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Ari89 reported by Nikopolyos (Result: )

Page: Life-death-rebirth deity
User being reported: Ari89

Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:

Each revert provides a slightly different frame of words, as i have attempted to find the most moderate tone possible - that will be acceptible to user Ari89, and to make the refences clearer to reinforce the who has done the research. I have not included the reverts of previous user Ceezmad who has also been entangled in an prior edit war with Ari89 over the same issue.

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:Edit waring in conjunction with belittling other users, accusations of lies, (in the articles talk pages) refusing to recognise valid research in this area. Ari89 claims that the paper is unrefrenced: i have offered references from The Encyclopeida Britanica, The Catholic Encyclopedia, two Professors in the field and journals; previous editors have also offered refrences which have been deleted by user Ari89. Forgive the clumsyness of my protocall, i have only joined wikipedia within the month; I am still catching up.
Nikopolyos (talk) 20:58, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

User:Vividuppers reported by User:ChrisO (Result: 31 h)

• Page: Michael E. Mann
• User being reported: Vividuppers (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

• Previous version reverted to:

• 1st reversion: 11:56, 25 December 2009
• 2nd reversion: 12:22, 25 December 2009
• 3rd reversion: 12:33, 25 December 2009
• 4th reversion: 13:27, 25 December 2009

• Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Comments

User:Vividuppers is repeatedly reverting to an old version of this article to restore material that was previously removed by several different editors on WP:BLP and WP:NPOV grounds. He has been requested to discuss his changes but has dismissed the previous discussions of this material as "bullshit" and has continued edit-warring to reintroduce it. -- ChrisO (talk) 12:48, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

The first diff doesn't count because I immediately reverted it as it was a mistake. A look at the talk page shows I am discussing the issue, whereas ChrisO isn't, and is simply attempting to get me blocked. Vividuppers (talk) 12:57, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

The presence of an ongoing discussion involving BLP issues is what makes this case particularly worrying. Vividuppers is warring against the efforts of multiple editors to keep the problematic material out of the article while issues are resolved. Chris Owen's pertinent comments about the material were given in a discussion on 20-21st December, which Vividuppers studiously avoids addressing. --TS 13:02, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

This guy has a history with BLP problems. Remember the Robert Fisk problem? Of course you do, as that was Vividuppers over at fisking in May. Viriditas (talk) 13:32, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

• Blocked 31 hours. WP:BLP/N is the appropriate venue if you believe that the Biographies of living persons policy is being used to chill debate. - 2/0 (cont.) 19:54, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

  Probably a bit too much as he had ceased editing some hours before the block. For that reason, should he come back soon and resolve to work in community with the other editors I would recommend an early unblock. --TS 03:40, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

I would be okay with that. If Vividuppers resolves to wait for consensus at the talkpage (and, ideally, engage a little more productively), unblocking would be a good move. - 2/0 (cont.) 10:46, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

User:suwaidanmd reported by User:sgmiller (Result:Page protected for two weeks )

Page: Tareq Al-Suwaidan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
User being reported: suwaidanmd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Tareq_Al-Suwaidan&diff=334023181&oldid=334010759

1. 00:11, 26 December 2009
2. 00:12, 26 December 2009
3. 00:17, 26 December 2009
4. 00:35, 26 December 2009
5. 01:09, 26 December 2009

Also: (this is same user with I.P. 199.212.7.17 but not signing , see discussion page)

1. 02:39, 26 December 2009
2. 03:16, 26 December 2009
3. 00:17, 26 December 2009
4. 00:35, 26 December 2009
5. 01:09, 26 December 2009
6. 21:46, 25 December 2009

1) The sentence "is a Kuwaiti entrepreneur, Islamic author and speaker, and a leader of the Kuwaiti Muslim Brotherhood." has been changed to ""is a Kuwaiti entrepreneur, Islamic author and speaker" multiple times in the last 12 hours.

This section has been deleted multiple times in the last 12 hours:

"Al-Suwaidan has been linked to activities associated with Hamas and has called for Muslims to "liberate the Holy Land" saying that "Muslims would sacrifice their sons for the holy mosque of Al Aqsa. In May 2007, Al-Suwaidan was listed by federal prosecutors, along with a group of U.S Muslim Brotherhood members, as an unindicted co-conspirator in the terrorism financing case against the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, convicted along with its leaders of financing Hamas. Al-Suwaidan has not been charged in any associated prosecutions."

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Suwaidanmd

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Tareq_Al-Suwaidan

Comments:

This article has been continually reverted by the same user acting under his user ID and unsigned with the same ID address. Basically, the user reverts almost all material that he feels is "negative" using constantly shifting rationale. Where discussion is provided, it usually concerns one aspect but the entire page is being reverted to the same version . The reversions center on three issues:

1) The identification of the subject as a leader of the Kuwaiti Muslim Brotherhood. The identification has been referenced to an article from a Canadian newspaper which "which called the subject "a U.S.-trained management consultant and a leader of Kuwait's moderate Muslim Brotherhood party." The user requested a reference yet despite this reference, all mention of the subject as a leader of the Kuwaiti Muslim Brotherhood have been reverted multiple times.

2) The subject's statement calling for Muslims to "liberate the Holy Land" saying that "Muslims would sacrifice their sons for the holy mosque of Al Aqsa." This was referenced to a Chicago Sun Times article. It has been continually reverted because the user has stated that such statements "give a false impression." No evidence has been presented to document this such as statements about the Mideast conflict that are in contradiction.

3) The inclusion of the subjects designation as an unindicted co-conspirator in the terrorism financing case against the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development. This fact has been reverted perhaps 50 times in the history of the article on the basis that the subject was not charged although, by definition, an unindicted co-conspirator is one who is alleged to have participated but is not charged.

First, the user demanded references and references had either been provided or were further enhanced.

Next, the user shifted his opposition stating "In the coat rack article WP states that it does not matter if the references are true, what matters is that the article doesn't become a coat rack for everything a subject has ever said or done. I will continue revisions based on this." The user has stated he feels that even though all of the facts are true, it is misleading and an example of a "coat rack" article saying "until you pose an argument against the abovementioned WP article I will continue to revert WITHOUT discussion." An argument was made against the article yet the user is still reverting without discussion.

In the latest iteration of the reverting, the user has stated that he is enforcing "the policy on biographies of living persons, where negative unsourced content is being introduced" event though there is no such unsourced content.

I would also note that the user has engaged in personal attacks call me at different times a " skewed pundit", an "anti-Islamist activist with slanted views", and "anti-Islamic."

Sgmiller (talk) 02:12, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

I've protected the page for two weeks, the alternative, without being sure about the BLP issues, seemed to be to block everyone and I'm loathe to do that. This should provide time for sorting out any BLP issues. I note what appears to be sockpuppetry - Sgmiller, you might want to file an SPI request. Dougweller (talk) 10:50, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. I will try to resolve this in discussion and if not, put up a notice on the BLP board. I assume SPI is Sock Puppet Investigation but I am not sure how to do this. Can you help me with this?Sgmiller (talk) 10:54, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes - read WP:SPI. Dougweller (talk) 12:55, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Tatsunoko vs. Capcom: Ultimate All-Stars

Some anonymous user with a changing IP address keeps changing "Casshan" (the way it is spelled in the latest version of the game) to Casshern (the way it is spelled in every other English translation). He has changed it about seven times now. Link. Also, this edit summary includes a personal attack. Pikamander2 (talk) 03:29, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

User:The359 reported by User:MDesjardinss (Result:Page protected for two weeks )

I don't know what this user's problem is. http://en.wikipedia.org/User:The359

Edit warring on Yuma, Arizona. *Note user has been blocked for edit warring before.(MDesjardinss (talk) 17:55, 26 December 2009 (UTC))

Protected the article for two weeks. Looking into sockpuppet issue as well; seems fairly clear what his issue is.  :) Kuru 18:59, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you so much, Kuru! :)(MDesjardinss (talk) 21:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC))

User:Epeefleche reported by User:Grsz11 (Result: )

Page: Northwest Airlines Flight 253 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
User being reported: Epeefleche (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: : Best I can tell as far as text goes (the original addition; issues with image is pretty simple to see

• 1st revert: 10:34 26 December
• 2nd revert: 3:39 27 December
• 3rd revert: 3:51
• 4th revert: 4:00
• 5th revert: 4:04
• 6th revert: 4:45
• (7th revert: 10:57)
• I don't know if this gets counted too.

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: for a recent one.

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Not a diff, but section.

Comments:

More recent reverts are adding an image that multiple editors felt was not needed and inappopriate. Grsz 05:50, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages edit warring