Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ridernyc

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs) at 18:03, 7 January 2010 (Re: DJ Nihilist Spam: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:03, 7 January 2010 by Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs) (Re: DJ Nihilist Spam: Reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Ridernyc's talk archive page 1 page 2

Sorry

I would like to apologize over a recent dispute we had. I thought that all the original research was cleared out of the article but it turns out that some the "facts" I saw were simply OR in disguise. I was foolishly unaware and thus acted stupidly. I understand what's going on now so I sincerely hope that you can forgive me for that. Thank you for showing me the truth and helping me be a better editor. Please accept this peace offering. --Twilight Helryx has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!


Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!


Apology(Ignacio Santibáñez)

It was hardly a article.The author should have tried it in sandbox.Even then I apologize,if the prod seemed disruptive.Happy New Year!--Adi4094 (talk) 09:01, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Hardly an article is no reason to prod. I'm going through your CSDs and prods right and your understanding of how the process works needs some work. I've already found one CSD that is clearly not a CSD candidate. I recommend you take a break from new page patrol. Ridernyc (talk) 09:04, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Really sorry

I clicked on the vandalism tab as i thought u marked my edits as vandalisation.I'm new.I reverted those immediately.Really sorry.Not my lucky day I guess. --Adi4094 (talk) 09:23, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

again since you are new I think it would be best if you learn a bit more before you patrol new pages. Ridernyc (talk) 09:29, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Why should i care?

Well if anyone wants to block me... ok. I was only doing what i was doing for fun any how. Thanks for the heads up though, i guese. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Corekidkiller (talkcontribs) 03:36, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Ridernyc. You have new messages at Razimantv's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NIN albums

Shouldn't you be held to your own standards? Ever consider getting consensus to keep the articles as they were before I made the correct changes? You are not the authority on those pages, as much as you'd might imagine. Deusfaux (talk) 10:43, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Consensus is clearly on my side since other people have reverted your changes in the past, and you are the only one who feels the need to make the changes. 11:28, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: DJ Nihilist Spam

Re your message: Yup. One more round of deleting and it's either semi-protect time or perhaps a hidden note to the editor to stop adding the entry. I might try the hidden note first. Semi-protect seems a bit of overkill. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Re your message: Okay, I tried a hidden note on one of their favorite articles, List of dubstep musicians. Maybe that will get their attention. They will probably add the link in to the usual articles and then stumble upon the note. Hopefully they will stop. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)