Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Erwin85Bot (talk | contribs) at 01:14, 8 January 2010 (New section: →[] nomination of []: Bot notification of AfD). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following: Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page. Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end. Please specify a descriptive subject or headline for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed. Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply. ⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

SmackBot suggestions

Hi Andrew, thanks for the note. SamckBot is run on a batch basis so most of this stuff would be difficult, however there is a COIbot that looks for autobiographical articles.

It would however be possible to tag for lack of inline citations, and maybe lack of references. Rich Farmbrough, 09:24 15 January 2009 (UTC).

Warnings

Re: Editing talk comments

Talkback

Deletein of ADRECS

Hi Andrew, can you tell me why the ADRECS article should be deleted - the Claverton Web site where it sits is an independent site comprised largely of energy experts and professionals. It is at least an interesting idea, and if feasible highly significant.

Kind Regards

enginemanEngineman (talk) 21:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Because it's not WP:NOTABLE. It's just someone's idea. There's no backing for it, it's not under serious consideration by anyone significant and there are no papers published on it. It might be brilliant, but that's not grounds for inclusion in WP. It seems like a lot of your stuff gets deleted, so why don't you spend some time working out where you're going wrong and change? Andrewjlockley (talk) 17:08, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bill Barker (police officer)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Bill Barker (police officer). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bill Barker (police officer). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)