This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Damiens.rf (talk | contribs) at 18:55, 13 January 2010 (→Nick Meers). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:55, 13 January 2010 by Damiens.rf (talk | contribs) (→Nick Meers)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Nick Meers
- Nick Meers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability. From the article, it seems it's just a good photographer doing his work. Main claim of notability is that "The National Trust holds many of his photographs", but it unfortunately goes unsourced. Having "produced photographs for over 30 books" doesn't seems astonishing. Good photographer? Yes. Notable? Not from what is said on the article. Damiens.rf 15:17, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. With 30+ published books to his name (including on the front cover as a co-author, not just as a contributor), I believe he is notable and worthy of inclusion on Misplaced Pages. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 18:00, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Note that it's not that he have written 30+ books. It's that his photographs have been used in 30+ books , and I don't think this is enough to make a professional photographer notable. --Damiens.rf 18:55, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. I have added a reference for the National Trust. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 18:37, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Is it notable? The National Trust holds many photographs of many artist. --Damiens.rf 18:55, 13 January 2010 (UTC)