This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2over0 (talk | contribs) at 01:00, 16 January 2010 (→Articles in the topic area of climate change are under general sanctions due to continued disruptive editing: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:00, 16 January 2010 by 2over0 (talk | contribs) (→Articles in the topic area of climate change are under general sanctions due to continued disruptive editing: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:
|
Archives | ||
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
SmackBot suggestions
Hi Andrew, thanks for the note. SamckBot is run on a batch basis so most of this stuff would be difficult, however there is a COIbot that looks for autobiographical articles.
It would however be possible to tag for lack of inline citations, and maybe lack of references. Rich Farmbrough, 09:24 15 January 2009 (UTC).
Warnings
Re: Editing talk comments
Hello, Andrewjlockley. You have new messages at Awickert's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
Hello, Andrewjlockley. You have new messages at Oren0's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Deletein of ADRECS
Hi Andrew, can you tell me why the ADRECS article should be deleted - the Claverton Web site where it sits is an independent site comprised largely of energy experts and professionals. It is at least an interesting idea, and if feasible highly significant.
Kind Regards
enginemanEngineman (talk) 21:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Because it's not WP:NOTABLE. It's just someone's idea. There's no backing for it, it's not under serious consideration by anyone significant and there are no papers published on it. It might be brilliant, but that's not grounds for inclusion in WP. It seems like a lot of your stuff gets deleted, so why don't you spend some time working out where you're going wrong and change? Andrewjlockley (talk) 17:08, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Bill Barker (police officer)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Bill Barker (police officer). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bill Barker (police officer). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles in the topic area of climate change are under general sanctions due to continued disruptive editing
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Global warming, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. - 2/0 (cont.) 01:00, 16 January 2010 (UTC)