Misplaced Pages

User talk:Nsaa

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fastily (talk | contribs) at 00:14, 4 February 2010 (→Autoreviewer: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:14, 4 February 2010 by Fastily (talk | contribs) (→Autoreviewer: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Status: Offline

This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nsaa.


This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.


User talk


This user has asked for Wikipedians to give him feedback at an editor review. You may comment on his edits at Misplaced Pages:Editor review/Nsaa.

Archives

RfD nomination of Glaciergate

I have nominated Glaciergate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Amazongate

I have nominated Amazongate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 15:55, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Pachaurigate

I have nominated Pachaurigate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 15:56, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

My talk page

You're welomce to raise an issue with me on my talk page. Once.

Once I've said "drop this dead donkey" that should be a hint that you don't need to say exactly the same thing yet again William M. Connolley (talk) 15:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

You are misusing your talk page by removing parts of the discussion. Reading Misplaced Pages:Talk_page_guidelines could be wise. I've just stated that for the record. Nsaa (talk) 15:41, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
To which guideline do you refer, Nsaa? Presumably you have looked at Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines#User talk pages and Misplaced Pages:Don't restore removed comments. . dave souza, talk 16:10, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Yes "Users should not remove only portions of another user's comment, nor edit their comment in any other way." Misplaced Pages:Don't restore removed comments. Nsaa (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
"Users should not remove only portions of another user's comment" Yes but you can remove the lot. "nor edit their comment in any other way" as in don`t chop it up. There is no prohibition to removing comments from your own talk page, else people could post abuse and it would be there forever :) --mark nutley (talk) 16:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, mark nutley, you beat me to it. The diffs show whole posts being removed, which is ok. . . dave souza, talk 16:24, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
(e.c.)I don't disagree. As I stated I think his behavior is bad "Why do you just remove parts of an ongoing discussion? Bad bad bad, but since it's you page I can't say much. Nsaa (talk) 14:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)"]. I've not claimed that he has broken any formal rule. Nsaa (talk) 16:26, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Nsaa, could you please use the edit summarys, else i see this I don't disagree. As I stated I think his behavior is bad
Thanks, just lasy and pasted in my comment. Nsaa (talk) 16:38, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

You are misusing your talk page by removing - no. I reject your assertion. If you think otherwise, and care to pursue it, find yourself an admin. Don't bother me about your incorrect interpretations of policy any more William M. Connolley (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Please comment on the content, not the contributor

I redacted part of your comment here. Please remember to comment on the content, not the contributor. - 2/0 (cont.) 16:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

E-mail-theft-gate listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect E-mail-theft-gate. Since you had some involvement with the E-mail-theft-gate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). 147.70.242.54 (talk) 03:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 1 February 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Autoreviewer

Hi, just wanted to let you know that I have granted autoreviewer rights on your account, as you have created numerous valid articles. This will have little or no effect on your editing, and is intended mainly to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information see Misplaced Pages:Autoreviewer, and feel free to ask if you have any questions. FASTILY 00:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)