This is an old revision of this page, as edited by O Fenian (talk | contribs) at 23:08, 6 February 2010 (→Regarding your edits to Birmingham pub bombings.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:08, 6 February 2010 by O Fenian (talk | contribs) (→Regarding your edits to Birmingham pub bombings.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)January 2010
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Birmingham pub bombings. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. O Fenian (talk) 18:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Community restrictions
The article Birmingham pub bombings, along with other articles relating to The Troubles, is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a previous Arbitration Enforcement case that closed in October 2007, and was amended by community consensus in October 2008. The current restrictions are:
|
O Fenian (talk) 18:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
January 2010 continued
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. O Fenian (talk) 23:22, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Notice
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Request concerning Ashill55. O Fenian (talk) 23:34, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Regarding your edits to Birmingham pub bombings.
The article Birmingham pub bombings, along with other articles relating to The Troubles, is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a previous Arbitration Enforcement case that closed in October 2007, and was amended by community consensus in October 2008. The current restrictions are:
|
---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 03:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
February 2010
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 23:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC)