This is an old revision of this page, as edited by LivingMuse (talk | contribs) at 07:01, 9 February 2010 (→The Symbolic Dimension: An Exploration of the Compositional Process). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:01, 9 February 2010 by LivingMuse (talk | contribs) (→The Symbolic Dimension: An Exploration of the Compositional Process)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)The Symbolic Dimension: An Exploration of the Compositional Process
- The Symbolic Dimension: An Exploration of the Compositional Process (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. A total of 27 hits on Google for this book. Ridernyc (talk) 04:38, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
What Google are you referring to, Ridernyc. I just did a search myself on Google and found this:
Results 1 - 10 of about 356 for Katia Tiutiunnik The Symbolic Dimension: An Exploration of the Compositional Process
You were wrong in saying that it only had 27 google hits: it has many more and the book has now been acquired by the National Library of Australia and many other prestigious institutions. GoldbergEva
"The Symbolic Dimension: An Exploration of the Compostitonal Process" is sold on many, many other sites besides Amazon and has been purchased by the National Library of Australia in addition to a number of prestigious university libraries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoldbergEva (talk • contribs) 06:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC) One person should not have the power to decide whether or not something is "notable"--especially if they are not an expert in the field. GoldbergEva
- Comment Hard to reply since the editor above me keeps adding comments randomly unsigned and totally out of order, but in response to the questions about hits total of 30. Ridernyc (talk) 06:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Further Comment