Misplaced Pages

User talk:The Four Deuces

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 17:11, 9 February 2010 (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 30d) to User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2010/January, User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2009/December.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:11, 9 February 2010 by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 30d) to User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2010/January, User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2009/December.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Archives
Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Communist genocide

Hi, and thanks for your advice regarding my 1RR sanction. I will think this over and then decide whether to appeal and what to write.

By the way, I made an interesting observation regarding the AfD of Mass killings under communist regimes.

  • the EEMLers had canvassed the vote twice, see 20090804-0758 by Digwuren and two days later by Martintg 20090806-0526
  • the EEMLers voted for only the same position
  • unusually many of the the EEMLers voted
  • the EEMLers sabotaged a 2/3 majority
  • support: triplestop, shawn, drmies, mintrick, offliner, russavia, abductive, lokiit, rankiri, ezhiki, ironholds, muzemike, passwordusername, the four deuces, good ol'factory, jeff g., irbisgreif, igny, nick-de, calton, rd232, multixfer, soap, dimawik, the red hat of pat ferrick, voluntary slave, soman, lk, csloat
  • oppose: piotrus, dgg, martintg, jacurek, hillock65, mandsford, poeticbent, vecrumba, termer, olenglish, sander säde, vision thing, shadowjams, radek, amateureditor, olaf stephanos, fOo, shyamsunder, pectore, smallbones, biophys, merovingian
  • support: 29 (of which: 0 EEMLer)
  • oppose: 22 (of which: 8 EEMLer)
  • percentage of support: 56.86 %
  • support (excluding EEMLer): 29
  • oppose (excluding EEMLer): 14
  • percentage of support: 67.44 %
  • 2/3 majority required for pass = 66.6 %

I think this should be pointed out to the arbs and the admins considering the AE threads. Offliner (talk) 17:29, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

RS/N & Transaction Publishers

If you can find it stated that Transaction Publishers are as bad as I feel them to be, in appropriate reliable sources, then it would be great if you could note the sources criticising Transaction for being a conservative / conspiracy theorist / white reactionist press whose standards of fact checking and faithfulness are those of your average CIA/Ford Foundation establishment that would be great. If it doesn't exist, then their texts will have to be case-by-case with the usual appropriate presumptions. Fifelfoo (talk) 01:44, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Socks

I supported the request - and also added the notice to his page --Snowded 06:38, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

I made a comment on the "sock puppet" page about "Can I". Is "BobIsBob2" in the same category, or different?" Rick Norwood (talk) 13:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring on Hugo Chávez

Look, your edit warring on Hugo Chávez is not acceptable. I did block you, but undid it when I saw that I had neglected to account for you starting to discuss on the talk page of the article. An edit like this, after SandyGeorgia had explicitly listed the reason for adding each one in her edit summary, is disruptive. Please stop. NW (Talk) 20:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

WP:NPA

Will you please refactor the section of your edit here that consists of a personal attack? Also, please note, e.g., that I support the article name change and also believe that anthropogenic global warming is occuring.--Heyitspeter (talk) 04:21, 9 February 2010 (UTC)