Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dominic (talk | contribs) at 11:30, 22 February 2010 (checked). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 11:30, 22 February 2010 by Dominic (talk | contribs) (checked)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Scibaby

Scibaby (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.

Report date February 20 2010, 23:52 (UTC)


Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Prolog

A common Scibaby pattern. Prolog (talk) 23:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Prolog (talk) 23:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

 Clerk endorsed Tim Song (talk) 04:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

 Confirmed along with Huetsen. Have reblocked another IP range. Dominic·t 11:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Category: