Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RegentsPark (talk | contribs) at 16:26, 26 February 2010 (→{{la|Nazareth}}: +note). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Shortcuts WP:RFPP WP:RFP WP:RPP Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Skip to table of contents requests to raise protection lower protection requested edits (purge) Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit

Archives

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

Current requests for protection

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Incidents at SeaWorld parks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection content dispute. I request that the current Temporary full protection be continued until 27 February 2010. Currently content dispute is still on going. (Reference old revision of this page at 18:52, 25 February 2010). Third opinion input has been received, compromises have been made, but rejected by one editor. Therefore a consensus has not yet been reached and approved.ARTEST4ECHO (talk) 16:11, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Russian Misplaced Pages (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection dispute, Edit war. vvv 16:05, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm having a difficult time AGF'ing about all these accounts and IP involved. But that's another issue. JamieS93 16:21, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Kilcoole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism. Reach Out to the Truth 15:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Mohammed Moysan Al-Otaibi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite create-protection, page repeatedly re-created following deletion discussion. MuffledThud (talk) 15:08, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Hacker T. Dog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite create-protection, repeatedly re-created page on non-notable person. MuffledThud (talk) 14:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Creation protected Willking1979 (talk) 15:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

2010 FIFA World Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection - repeated vandalism by editors inserting teams and results for games that are yet to be played. Dancarney (talk) 11:43, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

SWAT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection, vandalism. As you can see from this history from the last year this page is IP vandalised every 1-2 days, and the rate is increasing. SGGH 10:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:39, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Daniel Radcliffe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, This BLP page last came off protection 5 days ago and ever since then has been subject to the same excessive level of vandalism that happened before it went under protection. . 5 albert square (talk) 09:55, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Mexican Drug War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect and also semi protect Template:Mexican Drug War. Rcool35 Vandalism. Taylor Karras (talk) 09:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Bukkake (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection dispute, Dispute over term. CTJF83 GoUSA 08:54, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Current requests for unprotection

• WP:RFUP
• WP:RFPU

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Fat Family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection, Article has been protected from creation because it was created repeatedly with a non-notable website as subject. However, it is also the name of a notable Brazilian band, and I couldn't create it because of the protection. I tried to speak directly with the administrator who protected the page, but he is in a wikibreak. Thank you, Victão Lopes 22:13, 25 February 2010 (UTC). Victão Lopes 22:13, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Unprotected caknuck _° needs to be running more often 05:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Nazareth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Please unprotect or semi-protect if some protection remains absolutely necessary. I think that the page is ready for unprotection altogether. gidonb (talk) 13:44, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Have you come to a consensus? —Jeremy 21:34, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Jeremy, I was not part of the discussion which seems to have faded away, rather than resolved. If participants in the discussion do not take interest in the article at present, I see no reason whatsoever to protect. I would like to make general improvements in another area.

In this light it is SURPRISING that my request was moved to the the fulfilled/denied section, while NEITHER being fulfilled nor denied. Next it was REMOVED from the page, again without being fulfilled or denied and even without having a fair chance to respond to the question above, and all this in a VERY SHORT TIMESPAN. I am RELISTING this request to unprotect. gidonb (talk) 12:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Note: I've dropped a note on the protecting admin's talk page. Note that a bot automatically moves requests to the fulfilled/denied section so that's probably what happened.--RegentsPark (talk) 16:25, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

• WP:RFED

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Napoleon I of France (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Would an admin be kind enough to rename this article to "Napoleon I", dropping the "of France" from the title, or unprotected it so others could. The article is currently protected preventing others from doing so. The article was frequently vandalized in the past, so unprotected should probably not be done. However, a consensus was found here Talk:Napoleon_I_of_France#Title_:_Napoleon_of_France_.3F to rename the article. If nothing else, please give a reason that this can't be done, or what action needs to be taken for this to be done. Thanks. —Charles Edward  17:01, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Done Article moved. —Jeremy 21:38, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks you! But you don't seem to have moved the associated talk page. Could you check that out? —Charles Edward  21:45, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Fulfilled/denied requests

Serena van der Woodsen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Excessive IP vandalism of late from same or group of folks trying to claim a "birth date" for a fictional character that has none. . -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 06:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -FASTILY 06:55, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Twilight (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection vandalism. Andrea (talk) 05:43, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cirt (talk) 05:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Javier Hernández (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, The article has been a recent target of vandalism . GoPurple'nGold₂₄ 04:17, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -FASTILY 04:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Patrick Stewart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism of a BLP. 5 albert square (talk) 04:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -FASTILY 04:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

User talk:HalfShadow (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protect Been targeted by random IPs over the last three days or so; as each IP is vandalising both my page and another user's each time, it's clearly the same person. HalfShadow 03:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Semi-protected If you want it removed, leave a message on my talk page. -FASTILY 04:27, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Quincy Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Repeated vandalism from IPs. XXX antiuser 01:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -FASTILY 04:25, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

African-American Civil Rights Movement (1955–1968) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection Repeated vandalism. Virtually no productive recent edits. --sanfranman59 (talk) 01:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -FASTILY 04:24, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Stéphane Lambiel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. LiveJournal-incited vandalism from IP and new users, see Kolindigo (talk) 00:19, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -FASTILY 04:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Justin Tuck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, lots of IP vandalism, including subtle edits that go uncatched by other users. RF23 (talk) 23:47, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY 04:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

User talk:R12056 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection, I want my account and all associated information deleted and my talk page will no longer be needed. R12056 (talk) 23:35, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Declined We don't delete talk pages nor do we protect talk pages per user request (only in extreme cases of vandalism). -FASTILY 04:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Muay Thai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. Hutcher (talk) 05:07, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY 05:08, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Josh Ramsay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Lots of vandalism from discrete addresses and accounts, although all appear to be (as far as the IPs go) out of Canada, mostly Toronto and from the same service provider.

Including unconstructive edits from: Sav Love MT 70.50.133.18 Rmtrenchrulz 69.157.102.190 74.114.172.2. Shadowjams (talk) 01:31, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Kralizec! (talk) 02:00, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Luge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, The vandalism is back. NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 01:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 01:19, 26 February 2010 (UTC)