Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by LirazSiri (talk | contribs) at 20:42, 26 February 2010 (→Thanks: Abd's a nice guy, don't knock him). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Thanks

Thanks for your support - good to see not everyone's lost their mind - was starting to wonder if I'd lost mine. -- samj _in 16:05, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Sam, other editors can disagree with you without loosing their minds.LirazSiri (talk) 20:42, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

I recommend avoiding interacting with Abd except on article talk pages, and even then only address the article issues. It is too easy to be sidetracked by his dense and rambling prose and behaviour. If he puts inappropriate warnings on your talk, simply remove with a civil note that they are inappropriate or ask another to review and remove on your behalf. Verbal chat 16:23, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Abd can be a bit verbose at times but that aside he is definitely one of the good guys. He's not afraid to speak his mind and point out bad behavior. Unfortunately some people don't seem to appreciate that. LirazSiri (talk) 20:42, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks for the advice. I've basically told both of them to stay off my talk page and plan to stay well away from his - just needed a 3PO because (despite cleaning up their mess) I was looking like the ass. -- samj _in 18:18, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

I disagree.

If Sheldrake's page can be called pseudoscience in one post before mine, then I can call it hypothesis. Quit being a small mind. It is relevant, and only takes 1 kB of text. LoneRubberDragon (talk) 15:03, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

See WP:FORUM. Verbal chat 15:04, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Revert war

Verbal you yourself were in the revert war, you had three clear reverts and were standing on the bright line of edit war, the other user has 30 edits and and has little idea what is going on, whereas you are far more experienced, the article is locked move to discussion, I can't see a problem. Off2riorob (talk) 18:44, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Automated revert

Greetings - a Twinkle instance you set up reverted an edit I made to the Herbalism article, an edit I believe was legitimate. It seems it was triggered by the removal of a reference, but I also removed the off-topic content associated with the reference. I'd appreciate it if you could review the change, and either re-instate my edit or let me know why it shouldn't be re-instated. Thanks, Nickjg (talk) 19:43, 26 February 2010 (UTC)