Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/User conduct - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by InkSplotch (talk | contribs) at 23:46, 14 April 2010 (General user conduct: clarifying the instructions in this section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:46, 14 April 2010 by InkSplotch (talk | contribs) (General user conduct: clarifying the instructions in this section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Topics referred to by the same term Disambiguation iconThis page is a list of project pages associated with the same title or shortcut.
If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended page.
This page is part of the Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct (RfC/U) process, an early step in the Misplaced Pages dispute resolution process.

WP:RFC/U is an informal non-binding process enabling users to discuss problems with specific editors who may have violated Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. This venue lists all open/active RfC/Us.

Shortcuts
Are you in the right place?
Click in the corresponding box if you want to see:
Guidance on creating
or certifying RfC/Us
Draft
RfC/Us
Participating
in RfC/Us
Requests for assistance
with RfC/Us
Archived
RfC/Us

How to proceed

Instructions for this page

All participants in a user conduct RfC are expected to comply with the rules and guidelines, stated here, and below.

  • Once an RfC is created, it should be listed in the "Candidates pages" section, until the minimum requirements (listed below) have been met.
  • Once the requirements are met, the RfC should be moved from the "Candidate pages" section to the "Approved pages" section.
  • If the minimum requirements are not met, see closing and archiving (listed further below).

Minimum requirements

Before requesting community comment, at least two editors must have contacted the user on their talk page, or the talk pages involved in the dispute, and tried but failed to resolve the problem. Any RfC not accompanied by evidence showing that two users tried and failed to resolve the same dispute will be deleted after 48 hours as "uncertified". The evidence, preferably in the form of diffs, should not simply show the dispute itself, but should show attempts to find a resolution or compromise. The users certifying the dispute must be the same users who were involved in the attempt to resolve it.

Closing and archiving

RfC/Us should be closed in line with the rules and guidelines for closing an RfC/U. Certified disputes which have been closed in this way may be removed from this page and archived.

If the above criteria have been met, remove the link from the list here and add it to the archives at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive. If the dispute is handled in mediation or arbitration, please make a note of where the dispute resolution process continued.

RfCs which do not meet minimum requirements should be delisted from the "Candidate pages" section - they are not archived as they are considered "uncertified".

{{subst:ConductResult|outcome of RfC}} may be used for the closing of the RfC.

General user conduct

Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges (see section below) or the choice of username (see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User names).

See Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/Guidance for the steps on creating an RfC/U.

Once you have created the RfC/U, list the dispute by editing Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/UsersList

Use of administrator privileges

This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by Misplaced Pages:Administrators. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, blocking or unblocking users, and enforcing Arbitration Committee decisions. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the General user conduct section above. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/Guidance before creating an RfC/U.

Once you have created the RfC/U, list the dispute as follows by editing Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/AdminsList:

Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Example admin
Allegations: {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~


Use of bot privileges

This section is only for discussions specifically related to the operation of a bot. This includes the actions of unauthorized bots, bots without flags, and inter-wiki bots. It does not include the use of scripts or semi-automated tools on a user's account. If the dispute is over a bot owner's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the General user conduct section above. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/Guidance before creating an RfC/U.

Once you have created the RfC/U, list the dispute as follows by editing Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/BotsList:

Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Example bot
Allegations: {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~

See also

Categories: