This is an old revision of this page, as edited by A ghost (talk | contribs) at 19:33, 18 January 2006 (→LSHTM). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:33, 18 January 2006 by A ghost (talk | contribs) (→LSHTM)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Deep breathing exercises=
Hi Ian. Keep taking deep breaths - don't let idiots like 80.1.180.5 get to you. You're doing great! Cheers :o) Redvers ★ Hello ★ Doings 13:01, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll try and keep it up.--IanDavies 17:45, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Anthony Walker
Hi again Ian. Thanks for reverting the Anthony Walker article - I've reverted it 3 times in a day, the maximum allowed so I had to stop. However, I have reported the guy's IP range to Vandalism in progress so hopefully an admin will block the guy for a bit shortly. Cheers. Redvers ★ Hello ★ Doings 19:29, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- I've just had to do it again. It may be better to get the pages protected for a few days. The user seems to have a fairly limited agenda.--IanDavies 19:42, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
Anthony Walker again
Hi Ian. Blimey this is tiring. Nevertheless, we'll sort it out. Just don't let him push you over the 3RR as he'll take advantage. His latest trick, putting a page up about a different Anthony Walker, is very clever. But when my 3RR-ceiling expires at about 4pm UTC today, I've got a good way of sorting that one too. Hang in there. Redvers ★ Hello ★ Doings 12:25, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say clever they may just have noticed the what links here. They are very persisent. I'd expect the next move to be creating another page and changing links to the article.--IanDavies 14:26, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Railway Technical Centre
See note on talk page Chevin 10:06, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
LibDems
Hi, thanks for your comments about LibDems. I think you're referring to Liverpool City Council (if not sorry). It wasn't that I was trying to be pro-LibDem, it was just that what was there before my edit was hopelessly simplistic and not NPOV: "The Tories insisted on funding cuts being secret" etc etc. I'm guessing it was written from a socialist or pro-Militantviewpoint; I couldn't really think of how to rewrite it but thanks for your help there. 129.67.53.94 18:13, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- I can't find any evidence to support it. It's not that simplistic, govenment wants to be sensible but strong so want the concession kept quiet. Council someone blabs govenment imposses the 25%. It politics.--IanDavies 19:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry but I really think someone needs to find some evidence about LCC and the Thatcher Government. What you say there is just a hypothesis, hearsay, it might not even be true for all I or anyone else knows. Misplaced Pages isn't a place for conspiracy theories or guesswork to be fair. 129.67.53.94 22:17, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Liverpool districts table
Hi. Thanks for your message. I take it that I can put it back now without you reverting it again? (Oh, and if you ever want to leave a message for another user, don't forget to put it on their user talk page (rather than their user page), so they get notified!) --RFBailey 22:26, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Not having an accurate day. Yup change it back.--IanDavies 22:28, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
LSHTM
Please read WP:V and cease making personal attacks because you didn't get your way in an edit war. There are many resources available for dispute resolution; I suggest you avail yourself of one of them, perhaps an article Rfc, which you can make at WP:RFC. Or you could actually try to improve the article. KillerChihuahua 14:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Per your post on my talk page: In what way could the above possibly be considered a threat? KillerChihuahua 14:42, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Easily you just making up specious claims like Personal Attacks. To be honest you just showing more of you bullying nature here.--IanDavies 14:46, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
I trust I didn't tick you off too badly with my comments.--ghost 19:12, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- No I'm fine about it all. --IanDavies 19:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Good. I've known KC for a bit. I'm of the opinion that both your hearts are in the right place. But we can't all agree. Otherwise, people would never cut me off on the way to work. Where's the excitement in that? If we all stopped being rude to each other, the world would be boring. LOL--ghost 19:33, 18 January 2006 (UTC)