Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Piedras grandes (talk | contribs) at 23:30, 18 January 2006 (→Blocked: I'm obviously not one of them). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Unblock me please, I have just as much a right to edit as anyone else, besides the person who blocked me was obviously trying to cover up their violation of the WP:3RR rule here, here, and here do even need to go on? clear inpropriaty, unblock--Piedras grandes 05:31, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

The three reverts that you linked to were perfomed on more than one article, thus it doesn't breach the WP:3RR rule. Plus the rule states more than 3 reverts. - Akamad 05:47, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Can you please state why you believe you have been unfairly blocked so we can look into your complaints. Thanks - Akamad 05:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters

Hi. I noticed that you voted both to support and oppose this user's RFA. Can you clarify which of your votes you intended? Thanks! --Syrthiss 15:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Not a problem. I've almost done that a few times as well. :) --Syrthiss 16:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Plant sexuality

I am confused by your addition of "Speedy" and "Hoax" tags to this article. Could you please explain your rationale for doing so? Thanks. Guettarda 19:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Huh? Did you read the article? Guettarda 19:37, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Please stop

You have made a large number of edits to articles and the talk pages of articles, which are all the addition of templates which do not exist. What are you trying to do? Perhaps I can help you. KillerChihuahua 19:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Please use talk pages for constructive comments, not random criticism by adding a BAD label. That is not helpful or constructive. KillerChihuahua 20:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

KillerChihuahua is right; this needs to stop. Edits like this, putting your "good" template on the top of an article, are a bad idea. The developers are working on a feature called "article validation" that will allow multiple voices to weigh in on article quality in a systematic manner. Until then, coming up with your own scheme is inappropriate. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 20:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Templates

Please do not use the Good and Bad templates. Good is duplication of effort with the Good article campaign; Bad is simply useless because it is criticism without details - in other words, non-helpful criticism. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks much! KillerChihuahua 21:18, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

George W. Bush

Please don't delete links to related articles; they are all relevant. Thanks. Katefan0/mrp 03:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

"Not a stub"

Why did you add the text "not a stub' to Abas, son of Lynceus? If you don't think an article is a stub, then you should remove the stub template. Also, why did you add a 'Welcome' template to the bottom of my talk page when I've already been an editor for some time? Did you mean to? BillC 18:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Warning

Please stop adding nonsense to Misplaced Pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. KillerChihuahua 22:50, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Do NOT keep adding this template spam. It is not helpful nor constructive. KillerChihuahua 23:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for violating policy against vandalism. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.

KillerChihuahua 23:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Piedras grandes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I haven't done anything remotely vandal-like--Piedras grandes 23:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• Requests for unblock