This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DarknessShines2 (talk | contribs) at 19:40, 28 April 2010 (Reverted to revision 358896750 by Marknutley; coatrack = not policy, stop removing well sourced material. There is no blp violation either. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:40, 28 April 2010 by DarknessShines2 (talk | contribs) (Reverted to revision 358896750 by Marknutley; coatrack = not policy, stop removing well sourced material. There is no blp violation either. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| An editor has nominated this article for deletion. You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it.Feel free to improve the article, but do not remove this notice before the discussion is closed. For more information, see the guide to deletion. Find sources: "Bishop Hill" blog – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR%5B%5BWikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2FBishop+Hill+%28blog%29%5D%5DAFD |
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Type of site | Blog |
|---|---|
| Created by | Andrew Montford |
| URL | http://bishophill.squarespace.com/ |
Bishop Hill is a widely-read blog operated by Andrew Montford, author of The Hockey Stick Illusion.
A post on the blog led to the resignation of Philip Campbell, the editor in chief of Nature from the panel. In an interview with Chinese state radio when asked about the controversy, Campbell said that he believed nothing untoward had happened. The Guardian newspaper commented "The interview, posted on the Bishop Hill blog run by the climate sceptic Andrew Montford and shown on Channel 4 News, risked undermining Muir's claim that the inquiry team was impartial"
Roger Harrabin writing for the BBC on when the Parliamentary Committee investigating the Climategate Controversy published their findings said, sceptics on the Bishop Hill website ridiculed the MPs' findings. One asked: "Is it April fools already?" With another commenting, "No-one with half a brain cell will view this conclusion as anything other than a hasty and not very subtle establishment cover-up."
Andrew Orlowski, writing for The Register after it was revealed Lord Oxburgh who had been choosen by the University of East Anglia to head its enquiry into the illegally released files from the University Of East Anglia, actually had a leading role in a global warming campaign network called Globe International. This was quickly picked up by climate skeptic blogs. With Bishop Hill writing "GLOBE - a vehicle for avoiding Freedom of information"
External links
References
- Webster, Ben (2010-03-23). "Lord Oxburgh, the climate science peer, 'has a conflict of interest'". timesonline.co.uk. The Times. Retrieved 2010-04-22.
Andrew Montford, a climate-change sceptic who writes the widely-read Bishop Hill blog, said that Lord Oxburgh had a "direct financial interest in the outcome" of his inquiry.
{{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=(help) - Batty, David (12 February 2010). "Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned". www.guardian.co.uk. Retrieved 7 April 2010.
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help) - Harrabin, Roger (31 March 2010). "Climate science must be more open, say MPs". news.bbc.co.uk. p. 1. Retrieved 12 April 2010.
- Orlowski, Andrew (26th March 2010). "Anglia defends Oxburgh's eco network ties". The Register. Retrieved 12 April 2010.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - Montford, Andrew (Mar 24, 2010). "GLOBE - a vehicle for avoiding FoI". bishophill. Retrieved 12 April 2010.