Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tonalone

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tonalone (talk | contribs) at 03:41, 11 May 2010 (Undid revision 358967623 by MelodiousEros (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 03:41, 11 May 2010 by Tonalone (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 358967623 by MelodiousEros (talk))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome

Hello, Tonalone, and Welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Petslover :) (talk) 02:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Hi why do you remove stuf that are correct from the Bocelli page as if you are the only one who has the right to contibute to that page! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.92.5.54 (talk) 00:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi why do you assume I am acting like I am the only one who has the right to contribute to the page. Please see the comment attached to the removal.Tonalone (talk)

Because thats wat u do, u keep removing every thing people write, even when its sourced and state raisons that are subjective; like the award section in Bocelli's page for example: wats ur problem with me stating all the awards won by Bocelli during his carrer, all of which are important awards. Perhaps I should create a page titled Awards won by Bocelli, and just put a link to that article under Awards in the Bocelli article, if u prefer, but i dont see y i cant just put all of them.

Orphaned non-free image File:Vocal technique.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vocal technique.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


Leonardo da Vinci

Please do not remove statements that are well sourced, like Count Melzi's statement that Leonardo's love for his pupils was "passionate", and that Leonardo's sexuality had been subject to "satire". As it happens, the earliest mention (after his death) that Leonardo may have been homosexual comes from a 16th century satirical novel in which Leonardo is interviewed and questioned about his relationships and he says something to the effect that boys are irrestible at fifteen when taken from behind. The purported interview is satire. It is certainly not a serious study, but it does seriously indicate a trend that later analysis was to take.

Also, the reason for the odd placement of the reference in mid sentence is that words like "famous" etc are not used in wikipedia, unless they are cited. The referenced is to that one word, not to the whole statement. Amandajm (talk) 11:31, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

List of awards won by Bocelli

I undid your edits of the Bocelli award page, and the award section in the Bocelli article ... i don't see why we shouldn't put the awards in a seperate page, especially since I'm not done with editing the page you deleted. I was gonna do it the right way tomorrow but I need the page I started today, so I wouldn't have to restart everything, Tx. Plus there are many important nominations, for grammys and such that need to be added, and that will take too much space in the article. On the other hand, i don't have a problem with the edits you made with the Andrea Bocelli Template, I think I'll just write a separate article about each opera recording, as I would do for any of Bocelli's regular albums.Ahmad123987 (talk) 05:32, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Well other artists have pages about there awards, and it really isn't a big deal so you should maybe let it go. Plus grammy nominations, eccho awards and classical brit awards are important awards, (and being nominated to a grammy is a big deal) or else they wouldn't have thier own articles on wiki. I'm gonna undo it for the last time, please don't create n editing war for small deal.--Ahmad123987 (talk) 03:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Plus I haven't made the article feathure more awards, the awards listed are the same as was in the article the only diffrence is they are better organised. An another thing opera and classical music aren't the same thing.--Ahmad123987 (talk) 03:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

I know I meant opera music is singing arias from operas, and performing in operas, whereas classical music is a more generel term that includes other thinks, like a Canzone Napoletana or a hym, all of which Bocelli also performes, again not a big deal, so lets not argue over a simple word added in an article that is actually factual.--Ahmad123987 (talk) 03:43, 28 February 2010 (UTC)