Misplaced Pages

User talk:Quantpole

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 16:27, 30 May 2010 (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 10d) to User talk:Quantpole/Archive 2.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:27, 30 May 2010 by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 10d) to User talk:Quantpole/Archive 2.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Hi. Please feel free to leave a message. Bear in mind that I do make mistakes so just let me know and I might even apologise. Generally speaking, if you leave a message here then I will reply here.


Archives

/Archive 1, /Archive 2



This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (4th nomination)

Hi, Quantpole. Because you participated in Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (3rd nomination), you may be interested in Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (4th nomination). Cunard (talk) 02:22, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - May 2010

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter
Issue 25 - May 2010

April issue


Got any suggestions?
Add them here

Project News
  • Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 8,063 last month to 8,082 on April 29th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 55 is just behind WP:GM who have 56. WP:GM also has the lead in FAs at 44 out of a total number of 2,161 articles.


Currently we have eighteen Yorkshire featured articles:

Henry MooreCaedmonSheffield Wednesday F.C.George Calvert, 1st Baron BaltimoreHistory of SheffieldYork City F.C.Joseph PriestleyStocksbridge Park Steels F.C.M62 motorwayValley ParadeWilliam WilberforceHistory of Bradford City A.F.C.Last of the Summer WineEaldred (archbishop)Paulinus of YorkWilfridCosmo Gordon LangThomas of Bayeux

There are also ten featured lists:

List of York City F.C. Clubmen of the YearList of York City F.C. managersList of York City F.C. playersList of York City F.C. seasonsList of Bradford City A.F.C. seasonsList of York City F.C. records and statisticsList of Leeds United A.F.C. seasonsList of Scarborough F.C. seasonsList of awards and nominations received by Arctic MonkeysList of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cleveland


Thank you and well done to all those who contributed.


Article Activity

Bramhope Tunnel promoted to GA following review on April 2nd
Tickle Cock Bridge was nominated, reviewed and promoted to GA on April 3rd
Cottingley Fairies was nominated, reviewed and promoted to GA on April 27th


Member News

There are now 75 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that have joined us since the April newsletter:

No members left the project this month: though the number of active members is still currently low.


Thanks
  • A very big Thank you to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.
  • Thanks to those members that have been working on updating articles in preparation for the general election.
  • To the football and rugby editors who have done stirling work in keeping abreast of the top clubs.
  • To all the WikiProkject Yorkshire editors who have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist.

thumbs up Great!


Priority Articles

The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows -

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.


Yorkshire articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 2 1 15 60 78
FL 1 16 17
GA 2 7 36 176 221
B 9 67 137 363 576
C 5 144 303 1,522 1,974
Start 1 242 1,258 8,694 10,195
Stub 21 352 5,655 3 1 6,032
List 4 12 968 984
Category 2,937 2,937
Disambig 13 13
File 21 21
Portal 37 37
Project 194 194
Redirect 2 172 1,251 1,425
Template 521 521
NA 25 1,290 1,315
Other 12 12
Assessed 19 486 2,116 17,651 6,279 1 26,552
Unassessed 1 1
Total 19 486 2,116 17,651 6,279 2 26,553
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 97,225 Ω = 5.10
Assessment
Assess and review
As of 30 April 2010, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner.
(Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)


 Thanks

Aims

After discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008.

Specific aims for the project are:-

  • To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below)
  • To recruit more active editors (See Member News)
  • To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status
  • To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
  • To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive (See this month's feature below)
  • To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members

and apropos of the above a 2010 New Year article improvement drive/collaboration is being organised.


Elections

The next General Election will take place this month as will the local elections in a number of areas in the region and so again this month we need to concentrate our efforts on the articles relating to these.

Last month I concentrated on the general election related articles in the run up to the announcement of the election. This month we need to concentrate on the aftermath of the election. The constituency articles are the first ones that need to be looked at and the results added to each of these. This gives us an opportunity to have some references on these pages as there will be extensive media coverage for the results. The articles relating to the set of new MPs will need to be updated to include details of their election victory and the office they take up in the new parliamentary session. At the same time those articles relating to politicians who loose their seat will need to be updated to cover this and to show the successor to the seat/office they held. Other articles that need to be looked at are the settlement articles to see if they need updating as a number of them mention the party that represent the place and some give details of the MPs that represent them.

As well as the general election there is also the local elections that are being held on the same day and again this needs to be looked at when updating the settlement articles as the council make up is often described in the governance section or given in the infobox. These elections will necessitate new articles creating for each of the councils that are holding elections to record the details of the election and the results. Others may generate these articles and members should tag these with the project tag {{WikiProject Yorkshire}} when they find them so that they can be tracked and are not forgotten about.


WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project

The April 2010 articles selected below are the editors choice as no one came up with any other suggestions on the project talk page.

Month Dates Article(s)
B class choice Start class choice
III Mar 01, 2010 ~ Mar 31, 2010 The Human League Swaledale
IV Apr 01, 2010 ~ Apr 30, 2010 Patrick Stewart A64 road
V May 01, 2010 ~ May 31, 2010 River Derwent, Yorkshire Bolling Hall, Bradford

Please nominate future articles for improvement at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Yorkshire.


Please bear in mind...

The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis. The latest listing was created on March 23rd.

  • Monitoring is essential
    Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
  • Moves
    Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...

Written by Keith D and Harkey• Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View

Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!



Delivered May 2010 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 07:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Richard Goldstone - new version

You commented recently on some BLP issues concerning Richard Goldstone. I've written a considerably expanded and improved version of the article in my userspace at User:ChrisO/Goldstone. If you have any comments about this new version before it gets transferred into article space, please feel free to comment at Talk:Richard Goldstone#New version. -- ChrisO (talk) 23:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Notification: General sanctions and 1RR restriction on Richard Goldstone

You are receiving this message because of your involvement at the Richard Goldstone article. Please don't consider it an assumption of bad faith

As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.

  • Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
  • The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
  • Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
  • Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.

These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.

This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged here.

MoMK

As a contributor at the MoMK article and/or talk page, please take a look at the new draft and the draft's talkpage and voice your opinion. Thanks, The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 20:04, 29 May 2010 (UTC)