This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hammersoft (talk | contribs) at 16:54, 31 May 2010 (→Misplaced Pages:Non-free content criteria yet again: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:54, 31 May 2010 by Hammersoft (talk | contribs) (→Misplaced Pages:Non-free content criteria yet again: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Rollback
Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:
- Rollback gives you access to certain tools, including Huggle, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
- Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
- Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
- Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
- Please read Help:Reverting and Misplaced Pages:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
- You can test Rollback at Misplaced Pages:New admin school/Rollback
- You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page
- If you have any questions, please do let me know.
--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:34, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Your revert to my edit
You reverted my edit to Erysimum insulare. I'm quite used to this. It looks odd, but it had a useful purpose. Not to go into too much detail (unless you ask), the page for Category:Erysimum (that is, the genus that this plant belongs to) was alphabetized in several different ways, leading to the page showing three consecutive alphabets. OK, that's somewhat oversimplified. But I'm trying to put the Category page for the genus into one consistent alphabet. That means going to the article for each species that's in faulty order and editing the statement of category. I've done this for many genera category pages. Several times, I've been thanked for clearing up the page. When I've been reverted, I've explained matters. And in every single instance, the person who reverted me has seen my point and encouraged me to continue my efforts. 71.126.140.136 (talk) 00:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)Stephen Kosciesza
sry
Sorry about that accidental revert back to the vandalism diff, huggle was being a bit laggy and the page showed the vandalism diff, and when i clicked revert, it reverted Tide Roll's edits. Once again, I apologize. --Seahorseruler 00:45, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. --Alpha Quadrant (talk) 00:46, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the barnstar!
It's a great feeling knowing that others appreciate what you do for Misplaced Pages. I thank you dearly for awarding me that barnstar... I will always cherish it. Shannon ♫ (talk) 05:30, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Blatent Advertising?
Hi Ackworth97 here
I just wondered what you thought was blatant advertising in my article for Sundown Adventure Land. Since this page has been made and deleted before im just curious Please Get Back To Me As Soon As Possible
Jack
- That was the code it was deleted under, G11, that stands for blatant advertising. I do not know what the articles said, as it is deleted and only administrators can view deleted pages. I would ask the administrator who deleted the page. I would ask for a copy of the article so you can fix it. Then it can be reviewed at Articles for Creation. If you have further questions, I am on the wikipedia live chat. join live chat. I hope this helps, --Alpha Quadrant (talk) 15:38, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Non-free content criteria yet again
Re this edit summary: No, non-free images are NOT permitted in Portals. Portals are not articles. Portal space is not article space. Misplaced Pages:Non-free content criteria is explicit: YOU MAY NOT USE NON-FREE IMAGES ANYWHERE BUT IN ARTICLES. Not surprisingly, DASHBot came along and removed your policy violation just an hour and a half later . --Hammersoft (talk) 16:54, 31 May 2010 (UTC)