This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ZuluPapa5 (talk | contribs) at 03:58, 2 June 2010 (→Comments by other users: suspicious). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:58, 2 June 2010 by ZuluPapa5 (talk | contribs) (→Comments by other users: suspicious)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Scibaby
Scibaby (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
- Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/1
- Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/2
- Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/3
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.
01 June 2010
Suspected sockpuppets
- ClimateOracle (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- WavePart (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz
The usual. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Added WavePart. Hipocrite (talk) 10:20, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Doubtful about Wavepart being scibaby - but no doubt that hir is a sock of some kind. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 19:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Bayesian algorithm says "Reply hazy, try again." Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Doubtful about Wavepart being scibaby - but no doubt that hir is a sock of some kind. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 19:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
No reasoning but suspicious is given. I am suspicious that these blocks are helping Misplaced Pages to guide new editors to productive contributions. Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 03:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status – Endorsed for Checkuser attention. Requested by Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed Tim Song (talk) 22:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Categories: