Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ZuluPapa5 (talk | contribs) at 01:58, 3 June 2010 (→Comments by other users: correction it was right in front of me). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:58, 3 June 2010 by ZuluPapa5 (talk | contribs) (→Comments by other users: correction it was right in front of me)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Scibaby

Scibaby (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.


01 June 2010


Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz

The usual. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Added WavePart. Hipocrite (talk) 10:20, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Doubtful about Wavepart being scibaby - but no doubt that hir is a sock of some kind. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 19:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Bayesian algorithm says "Reply hazy, try again." Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Added Weakopedia. Probably not Scibaby, but definitely someone per first edit, general stalkery behavior of various persons and username/userpage being obvious not-new-user territory. Note that Ombudsperson Lar has stated in - " If I were a current CU (as an Ombudsman I am recused from any CU activity) I'd probably run a check, it's within the CU remit to do that when we think things are "off"," so no need to be concerned about the Ombudspersons coming down on you. Hipocrite (talk) 23:47, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users

No reasoning but suspicious is given. I am suspicious that these blocks are helping Misplaced Pages to guide new editors to productive contributions. Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 03:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Hipocrite, i appreciate you are concerned about weakopedia, however you may be abusing this page, please reconsider. I have not seen a second to your concern, you added after the endorsement and you were just involved with weakopedia about this scibaby topic which looks like a retributive request. Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 01:29, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Endorsed for Checkuser attention.    Requested by Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

 Clerk endorsed Tim Song (talk) 22:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Categories: