This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ZjarriRrethues (talk | contribs) at 23:05, 8 June 2010 (The verdict is on the admins who banned him twice. If my comments disruptive then they wouldn't have banned him. Now per wp:talk I'm removing this). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:05, 8 June 2010 by ZjarriRrethues (talk | contribs) (The verdict is on the admins who banned him twice. If my comments disruptive then they wouldn't have banned him. Now per wp:talk I'm removing this)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
th
Ok thanks, but 1 thing, Albanian language has to be checked again because i think it could be rate as good article!
DYK for Cuneus Prophetarum
 | On June 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cuneus Prophetarum, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
pov edits
It seems you are again into this povish game, cherry picking specific parts. Suppose you ignored this part ] of the same book.Alexikoua (talk) 09:42, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- The author has written two seemingly opposite sentences but Albanian can only mean Albanian while Greek can easily be interpreted as Orthodox especially in relation to the distinction he makes with Ottomans. For the ethnic composition of the town there's also this , which I could add if you want more sources but the ethnic composition of the town isn't the subject of article.--— ZjarriRrethues — 09:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- Very weird explanation (Greek means something else, while Albanian Albanian). I'm not interested in Kosovo related stuff, but since you agree that the town's ethnic composition isn't the subject of the article (quite mysterious since you added this highly dubious part), it means that you dont have problem to be removed.Alexikoua (talk) 10:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- I mean that the town's ethnic composition isn't the subject of the article but the siginificance of the surrender of the Turks is in connection with Albanians is part of the article. It isn't a weird explanation but a copy/paste from the most used dictionary of the English language on the internet .--— ZjarriRrethues — 11:01, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- I have to agree with Alexi here. This edit has the major hallmark of POV-pushing: cherrypicking a source, citing it out of its immediate context just because it contains that little statement we so much want to see... The fact is that that sentence, bereft of context, means almost nothing to anyone outside the Balkans, except of course that "Ioannina was an Albanian city". I have edited the phrase and removed the assertion of ethnicity, since Hall cannot obviously agree with himself on this issue. Constantine ✍ 11:24, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- It would also be less barefaced POV-pushing if you had at least tried to contribute towards improving the article in general, and had not just limited yourself to adding this one piece of POVish material... Constantine ✍ 11:26, 8 June 2010 (UTC)