This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JzG (talk | contribs) at 20:32, 13 June 2010 (reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:32, 13 June 2010 by JzG (talk | contribs) (reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Jehovah's Witnesses publications for evangelizing
- Jehovah's Witnesses publications for evangelizing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Insufficient third-party sources. Individual publications fail notability guideline for books. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Jehovah's_Witnesses#JW_publications Jeffro77 (talk) 08:11, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, Misplaced Pages is not an evangelical resource for any religion. Guy (Help!) 14:43, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Although I can appreciate Guy's concerns, I believe that one can write an encyclopedic article about evangelism in an impartial, non-evangelical tone. Although this is one of the smaller denominations (7 million people), it is, like the Mormons, one where the members are expected to be actively evangelical. For those who have ever seen the Land Shark skits from the original Saturday Night Live, I'm not ready to club the guy bringing "The Watchtower" to the door. Mandsford 18:57, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sure you can, but it would need to be something other than a directory and sourced from independent sources. Which this isn't. Guy (Help!) 20:32, 13 June 2010 (UTC)