This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Melchoir (talk | contribs) at 09:25, 30 January 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:25, 30 January 2006 by Melchoir (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- For other meanings, see Euler function (disambiguation)
In mathematical analysis, Euler's identity is the equation
where
- is Euler's number, the base of the natural logarithm,
- is the imaginary unit, one of the two complex numbers whose square is negative one (the other is ), and
- is Pi, the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter.
Derivation
The equation appears in Leonhard Euler's Introductio, published in Lausanne in 1748. It is a special case of Euler's formula from complex analysis, which states that
for any real number x. Since cos π = −1 and sin π = 0, substituting x = π in Euler's formula gives
which is a simple form of the identity.
Perceptions of the identity
Many people find this identity remarkable for its mathematical beauty. The identity links what are arguably the most fundamental mathematical constants:
- The number 0.
- The number 1.
- The number π is a fundamental constant of trigonometry, Euclidean geometry, and mathematical analysis.
- The number e is fundamental in the study of logarithms and occurs widely in mathematical analysis.
- The imaginary unit i (where i = −1) is a unit in the complex numbers. (Introducing this unit yields all non-constant polynomial equations soluble in the field of complex numbers: see fundamental theorem of algebra.)
Furthermore, the most fundamental functions of arithmetic are also present exactly once: addition, multiplication, and exponentiation. As well, an equation with zero on one side is the most fundamental relation in mathematics.
Benjamin Peirce, the noted nineteenth century mathematician and Harvard professor, after proving the identity in a lecture, said, "It is absolutely paradoxical; we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means, but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth."(refactored from Maor)
References
- Maor, Eli, e: The Story of a number (Princeton University Press, 1998), ISBN 0691058547
Notes
Template:Ent Maor, p. 160. Maor cites Edward Kasner and James Newman's, Mathematics and the Imagination (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1940), pp. 103–104, as the source for this quote.