This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Enigmaman (talk | contribs) at 16:40, 19 July 2010 (→Six-Day War: cmt). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:40, 19 July 2010 by Enigmaman (talk | contribs) (→Six-Day War: cmt)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Talkpage format
Hi. If you put your responses in middle of another editors comment it confuses the reader. By "splitting" the comment the first part is unsigned and who is saying what will be unclear. Please reformat your comments so that it does not "break" another editors comments. Thanks, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 16:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
I don't believe I did so.JRHammond (talk) 16:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- My bad. Sorry, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 16:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Six-Day War
Template:Uw-3rr2 ← George 06:56, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Tell it to Jiujitsuguy, George. I've rightly corrected the article to comply with Misplaced Pages's NPOV and verifiability policies. Jiujitsuguy 3 times now has undone my right and proper revision, to make it read in a manner that violates that NPOV policy.
The last time he undid my edit, he did so with the comment that there is "no consensus" for it. But that's just the point, a perfectly good reason for my edit. As you will observe on the Talk page, there is no "consensus" that the attack was or was not "preemptive". The sentence thus, by his own logic, read so as not to assert either POV as fact, as my corrective has properly done.
I will continue to re-do my edit so long as Jiujitsuguy (or anyone else, for that matter) continue to undo it so that the sentence asserts as fact what is a subjective judgment, in violation of Misplaced Pages standards and policies.
Take your complaint to Jiujitsuguy, with whom it would have legitimacy.JRHammond (talk) 07:57, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- "I will continue to re-do my edit so long as Jiujitsuguy (or anyone else, for that matter) continue to undo it..." IOW, you're vowing to continue edit warring in direct violation of Misplaced Pages policy. Unacceptable. Enigma 16:40, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
July 2010
Notice of enforcement action--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 16:07, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Notice of discretionary sanctions
As a result of the Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles, the Arbitration committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to Israel, Palestine, and related conflicts. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here. These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. Enigma 17:51, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Blocked 31 hours
For a clear violation of WP:3RR. Please note that whether you think you're right or not, or whether you think you're restoring "NPOV" or not, does not affect whether or not it's edit warring. Unless you're removing clear vandalism or defamation (not the case here), it is edit-warring, period. If you persist with this behaviour after returning from your block, you will be blocked for a lengthier period of time. Enigma 19:01, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
The 3 revert rule states "An editor must not perform more than three reverts (as defined below) on a single page within a 24-hour period." I did not perform more than three reverts within a 24-hour period. Therefore, I did not violate WP:3RR. Restore my status. JRHammond (talk) 01:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- You made four reverts on July 16, after inserting material that did not have consensus on the talk page. Enigma 16:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC)