This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Otto4711 (talk | contribs) at 01:50, 26 July 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:50, 26 July 2010 by Otto4711 (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Graboid
AfDs for this article:- Graboid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete - previous nomination closed no consensus and in the interim no new potential sources appear to have emerged. There is no indication that this fictional creature is independently notable. Those few sources which mention it do so either completely in an in-universe capacity (describing the plots of one or more of the films or the TV series) or mention the creature in passing. It fails both the general notability guideline and the guideline for writing about fiction. There is no question that the Tremors films are notable. However, the notability of a work of fiction does not mean that every aspect or element within that work of fiction is notable. Otto4711 (talk) 01:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Categories: