This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GB fan (talk | contribs) at 14:00, 26 July 2010 (moved Talk:CA, Inc. to Talk:CA Technologies: New name of the company website confirms it is the new name). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:00, 26 July 2010 by GB fan (talk | contribs) (moved Talk:CA, Inc. to Talk:CA Technologies: New name of the company website confirms it is the new name)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CA Technologies article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
New York (state) C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Companies Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||||||
|
Acquisition List
Is the acquisition list appropriate? For comparison I checked Cisco Systems (another company with many acquisitions) and there is no similar list there. If the list it kept, I also believe it should be in chronological order rather than most recent one first. Kevink707 (talk) 14:29, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Cruft
I'm pulling the following bits out of the rewrite for now because I haven't been able to make sense of what is being said, and I am unable to verify what I can work out is being said.
- The company reached an agreement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to pay $225 million in compensation to shareholders.
- SEC, FBI, and Deputy Attorney General James Comey (head of the Bush Administration's Corporate Fraud Task Force)
- It was the world's third-largest independent software company with approximately 16,000 employees, and a 1999 IndustryWeek 1000 company.
--Tony Sidaway 19:27, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
135.196.23.9 15:10, 9 February 2006 (UTC) not the best software in the world, WWW.ASG.COM has far better software - I have just completed a swap of CA solutions to ASG offerings due to costs and features. IMHO
Acquisition / Product Offering Consolidation
CA's acquisition of Concord gives it new products and technologies, namely eHealth and SPECTRUM. I'm still not sure if they plan on folding some of the tech from SPECTRUM / eHealth into the existing Unicenter product line, or if the will continue to exist as a separate product. CA does still appear to be selling SPECTRUM as a standalone product at this point in time. Tel Janin 03:18, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
Charles Wang
I had always heard that Charles Wang's last name was actually pronounced Wong and that if you were applying there and messed that fact up you were immediatly disqualified. Anyone else hear that or have a source? Sabalon 14:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Charles Wang's last name is actually pronounced "Wong," but I don't think they "immediately disqualify" you if you mispronounce it during an interview. Charles himself would correct you. It should be noted that Charles HATES to be called "Charlie," though.
"Where software goes to die"
I've heard this expression around the software industry - but don't know if it's appropriate for the article, etc. Suggestions? --64.252.38.171 03:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Probably not. Unless this phrase was used widely in secondary sources, it would not meet the criteria for inclusion in this encyclopedia article. The criteria for including facts like this are at Misplaced Pages:Verifiability. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 21:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
See the following for quotes of "where software goes to die" http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=181500365 http://www.vnunet.com/articles/print/2152300
I think the term is in line with policy, as long as you mention explicitly it is a Larry Ellison quote. However, as it is a bit of a crude joke, personally I would think twice before entering it. When you give it some thought, the statement is actually incorrect. CA is not known for killing software, but for 'milking' mature software packages: maintaining lucrative support contracts. --BalderV (talk) 12:32, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Request that page is not deleted, since it has been edited for a more Neutral tone
Thank you for reviweing this article. I have edited and removed all material that could have been regarded as adverstising or non-netral. Article now has a style similar to other software manufactures that are not flagged as non-neutral (e.g. BMC Software). Many thanks for your help.
Watpe01 (talk) 00:17, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- It is pretty neutral by now, but it is too much oriented towards corporate structure and economical info. I'm more interested in how it earns money: products and services. Said: Rursus (☻) 14:32, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- I see that a speedy delete was thrown on this recently. CA is one of Long Island's biggest employers and with nearly 14,000 employees it's kinda a big ass company. There's a giant complex of support buildings including several hotels built around its hq. It needs to be toned down on the advert wording but the company itself is VERY notable. Americasroof (talk) 09:16, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Changed label to 'tidy' Cosnahang (talk) 16:51, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
S/W
Does anyone have info on its software? Info needed! Said: Rursus (☻) 14:29, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
How to change article title to match current name?
So now that CA, Inc has officially been renamed "CA Technologies", how do we change the name of this article from "CA, Inc." to CA Technologies"? I saw nowhere on the page edit form to do so.
Brian (talk) 19:32, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Brian Zurita
Categories: