This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tothwolf (talk | contribs) at 16:23, 1 August 2010 (→Ircle: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:23, 1 August 2010 by Tothwolf (talk | contribs) (→Ircle: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Welcome, correspondents
If you're here because I deleted an article you think should be undeleted, please read this first and remember--Most of the time, I didn't write the text that appears in the deletion summary.
N.B. I don't respond well to either fawning or abuse. Talk to me like a peer, assume good faith, and you'll find I reciprocate in my helpfulness.
Position Essays may help you understand my point of view with regard to...
Administrator Goals
Doing my best to improve the tiny little wedge in the top center:
Merge discussion for Foot odor
I have proposed that Smelly socks be merged to Foot odor. Since you contributed to the recent AfD on Smelly socks, you might be interested in participating in the discussion to merge at Talk:Foot odor#Merger proposal. SnottyWong 05:23, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
WT:NOT
Hi, Jclemens. Because you helped clarify the wording at WP:UP#GAMES, I hope you can help me propose a wording at WP:NOT that discourages using Misplaced Pages as a game server for secret pages. I have started the discussion at WT:NOT#Does WP:NOTMYSPACE apply to secret pages? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Weighed in. Thanks, Jclemens (talk) 05:48, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
CSD G10 of User:NatDemUK
Thanks for looking into it. MfD is probably not going to be worth it as the user's heading toward a ban at WP:AN. N419BH 01:36, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Yeah, a ban would probably moot the MfD. Jclemens (talk) 01:51, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
jacob green recreated
You just deleted Jacob green. It was recreated immediately afterwards. --Biker Biker (talk) 14:46, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- ... and deleted again by someone else, but thanks for the heads up. Jclemens (talk) 15:14, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Colegio Nautilus
Dear Editor, Please consider the undeletion of Colegio Nautilus. This school has been a landmark private school in the ciity of Acapulco, Mexico for over 30 years. It has been distinguished as a cultural landmark in the state because of our enviornmental programs for children applied thru government institutions and thru grants form the University of Berkeley in California and University of California Irvine and Greenpeace. This awards have only been given to this school in all the Mexican Country. The school also has the Colegio Nautilus Hurricane Fund for the victims of past hurricanes in Mexico since 1996. It has donated thousands of dollars to many relief associations. you can check online for all reference mentioned above. We have already gathered many information to update the page so its more rich in information and linked to many other pages. If you could please reinstate this page.... we in Acapulco would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.--Aoscos (talk) 08:53, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Restored per your request, feel free to improve the article to address the concerns of the person who proposed its deletion. Jclemens (talk) 15:15, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Question:
Inre Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Avengers (2012 film) and Talk:The Avengers (2012 film)#Notability... when was the GNG rendered historical? I have many times lost arguments when defending the use of SNGs when a topic failed meeting GNG... and here the GNG is ignored in-toto in favor of mis-interpretations of SNGs. SNGs now have precedent? When did that happen? I must have missed the newsletter. And of course, this was not exactly a helpful request toward having a balanced discussion. Yikes. Schmidt, 01:40, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
- It's a reasonably neutral notification of an interested Wikiproject, which is fine. I've always taken a logical OR view of the GNG and SNGs, but some people prefer a logical AND, or even ignore the GNG entirely when an SNG applies. It's not a big deal if it gets re-redirected, really--the conversation itself is worth having, which was my point. Jclemens (talk) 02:02, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
Becksguy has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Additional note on my talk page - Becksguy (talk) 04:42, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! Jclemens (talk) 18:47, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
RfC on Media Matters for America at WP:RS
Hello there, JClemens. There was a recent discussion at WP:ANI regarding the systematic removal of Media Matters for America as a reliable source. I've started an RfC regarding MMfA, Media Research Center, Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting, Newsbusters etc. at Misplaced Pages: Identifying reliable sources. Some of us believe that these hyperpartisan sources should never be used as factual sources at Misplaced Pages, due to their tendency to selective edit facts. Please participate in this important discussion, concerning one of Misplaced Pages's most fundamental editing policies, on the Reliable Sources Talk page here. Skoal. Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 14:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification. Jclemens (talk) 18:47, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Ircle
Please restore Ircle. This topic would easily pass AfD. The recent actions by User:Miami33139 in trawling though my contributions in order to CSD/prod/AfD/MfD/etc things I've edited amount to wikihounding and tendentious editing and I'm really not sure what to do about it. Despite a formal warning/reminder from Arbcom, Miami33139's behaviours have continued with his return to editing the first week of July .
I'm not the only editor this individual is actively wikihounding and I think his contribution history speaks for itself. While Miami33139 certainly has made great attempts to evade detection, the patterns and signs of disruptive editing are clearly evident in both his recent and past contributions and the disruption and attempts to drive away productive editors continue to harm Misplaced Pages and the community.