This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 69.192.228.224 (talk) at 06:10, 2 February 2006 (→rename to chola dynasty?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:10, 2 February 2006 by 69.192.228.224 (talk) (→rename to chola dynasty?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Hinduism Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Template:Wikiproject History of India
Can anyone help by writing just a few lines about each of the kings
- Kishore 06:05, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
Hey kishore,
Better read the "Ponien selvan" By kalki..It explains about each ruler superbly.
Yogananth
- Thanks Yogananth. I was more concerned to improve the article. If you have read "ponien Selvan" and/or have a fair idea abour Cholas, you can help improving the article.
Kishore 15:02, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Etymology of kallaNai is so out of place here. I am going to move it a new article on kallaNai. --Sivaraj 03:42, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Only three Dynasties?
I'm guessing that what people mean by the 'three dynasties' ruling over Tamilnadu are the Cholas, Pandyas, and Pallavas, i.e. not Cheras which were based in Kerala. But if people know that Cheras also ruled in Tamilnadu at some point, let's give them a mention in that connection. QuartierLatin1968 21:46, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Kerala is a separate political entity only after Independence. Before that the whole region (Tamil Nadu + Kerala) was ruled by different monarchies at various points in time and no distinction was made with respect to Kerala. AFIK, Tamil tradition mentions Cheras as part of the "three dynasties". A more convincing fact is that Ilango who authored the Tamil epic Cilappatikaram was a prince from the Chera dynasty. -- Sundar 04:51, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Oh, right, of course. That does make sense. I put a link to the Pallavas at their first mention of the article instead. (PS: I've also been trying to sort out the Roman numerals in this article – "Rajaraja Chola-I"? "Henry-VIII"? It looks quite odd. So I'm afraid you inadvertently reverted my Roman numeral fixes as well! No worries though, I've set it back again.) QuartierLatin1968 18:18, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Oops! I'm sorry. It was unintentional. -- Sundar 04:13, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
expand on the empire building in southeast asia?
Can anyone expand on the campaigns and cultural fussion on that part -- Dangerous-Boy
Make a map
Someone should make a map like in the Chinese dynasties. --Dangerous-Boy 07:33, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
I added a map, overview, images, plus references from my Chola Empire page
Hey guys, I added a IMPERIAL MAP and overview plus references from my Chola Empire wikipedia page which I created. Plus other images referenced with sources, did some minor reorganizing of content here too so that there's no repeating of info. Let me know what you guys think. I think it better reflects the glory of the Chola empire and their military and cultural exploits. Enjoy,
Chola 02:10, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Nice work. Make sure you tag your map or might get deleted. --Dangerous-Boy 08:35, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Hey DangerousBoy, How do I tag the map? I entered the following after adding it: This image was found at Encyclopedie Enligne: http://www.encyclopedie-enligne.com/Images/c/carte_chola.png The original page where this image was found is: http://www.encyclopedie-enligne.com/c/ch/chola.html Was this done correctly or is this not considered a tag, please check it out and give me feedback, i'd like to keep adding to this page :). Thanks!
Chola 19:34, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- You can choose an image copyright tag from here: Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags --Dangerous-Boy 22:14, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Okay, I added the tags. Thanks. Chola 23:34, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Capitals
I added Poompuhar and Pazhaiarai as capitals. Sources being Tamil literature and general history... shash 06:11, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for taking interest Shash. I reverted the edit, however, because I want to maintain encyclopedic standards. I don't think all details and comments about the Cholas should be added, only the most important and relevant facts in an easy to read manner. Most of the Empire pages on Misplaced Pages are designed with an aesthetic sensibility to promote understanding of that particular empire and culture to the global internet community. Thus, it's important to keep the information fresh and easily readable with only the most important information. The problem with most of the articles on Tamil empires is that they focus far too much on the Early Dynasties, mention many small details from early history and thus make readers lose interest before reading the real contributions and accomplishments of those civilizations. We need to start promoting knowledge of the big achievements so those outside the Tamil community can better appreciate our civilization. A new effort should be made to promote understanding of Tamil Empires just as the Ottoman and other Empire pages have done Turkish Civilization. Thanks again.
-- Chola 18:34, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
rename to chola dynasty?
?--Dangerous-Boy 11:34, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
-Kumar, no point renaming it "chola dynasty" since a dynasty is only a ruling family. This page seems to be more about the "chola empire", thus focusing more on its collective Imperial contributions as opposed to specific individuals who ruled the empire.
Categories: