This is an old revision of this page, as edited by InFairness (talk | contribs) at 04:13, 5 February 2006 (Add reason for NPOV dispute). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:13, 5 February 2006 by InFairness (talk | contribs) (Add reason for NPOV dispute)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)NPOV
Though I am not an expert in this area, it seems that the writer(s) wish(es) to push a particular point of view, one of somewhat fanatic (if fervent and heartfelt) Slovak nationalism.
Referring to the double cross as coming from the Byzantine tradition (ultimately true enough) without mentioning that it was adopted by 'Hungarian' ruler Bela III, who was brought up in the Byzantine court, seems to have no other purpose than completely ignoring Hungarian presence and rule in the area of modern Slovakia, as does referring to "Bratislava", which was not called that at that time--it actually had many different names.
Also, is the info on the patriarchal cross better placed in the article Patriarchal cross?
Please refer to the article on the Coat of arms of Hungary for a better example of a neutral toned article.